From: Jason Wang <jasowang@redhat.com>
To: Eugenio Perez Martin <eperezma@redhat.com>, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Cc: yvugenfi@redhat.com, si-wei.liu@oracle.com,
"Michael S. Tsirkin" <mst@redhat.com>,
Dragos Tatulea <dtatulea@nvidia.com>,
Shannon Nelson <snelson@pensando.io>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 00/12] Prefer to use SVQ to stall dataplane at NIC state restore through CVQ
Date: Tue, 25 Jul 2023 15:15:16 +0800 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <18f8d9c7-fa1d-7e45-82cc-7bd742ec18fd@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAJaqyWdkyX9Ha-kd+haqEpfXfpVhSLmRa5hkZZGkvZjrD4Ketg@mail.gmail.com>
在 2023/7/21 14:48, Eugenio Perez Martin 写道:
> On Thu, Jul 20, 2023 at 8:15 PM Eugenio Pérez <eperezma@redhat.com> wrote:
>> At this moment the migration of net features that depends on CVQ is not
>> possible, as there is no reliable way to restore the device state like mac
>> address, number of enabled queues, etc to the destination. This is mainly
>> caused because the device must only read CVQ, and process all the commands
>> before resuming the dataplane.
>>
>> This series uses the VirtIO feature _F_RING_RESET to achieve it, adding an
>> alternative method to late vq enabling proposed in [1][2]. It expose SVQ to
>> the device until it process all the CVQ messages, and then replaces the vring
>> for the guest's one.
>>
> A couple of things I forgot to add:
> * Assuming the implementation of _F_RING_RESET in vdpa is calling
> kernel vdpa ops .set_vq_ready(vq, false). I'm not sure if this is the
> best implementation, but it is currently unused in the kernel. At the
> same time, .set_vq_ready(vq, true) also enables the vq again.
I think we need another ops, as set_vq_ready() tends to be functional
equivalent to queue_enable.
If we reuse set_vq_ready(vq, false), we would get conflict in the future
when driver is allowed to stop/resume a specific virtqueue via setting 0
to queue_enable. And that's also the reason why queue_enable is not
resued to reset a virtqueue.
>
>> As an advantage, it uses a feature well deviced in the VirtIO standard. As a
>> disadvantage, current HW already support the late enabling and it does not
>> support RING_RESET.
>>
>> This patch must be applied on top of the series ("Enable vdpa net migration
>> with features depending on CVQ") [1][2].
>>
>> The patch has been tested with vp_vdpa, but using high IOVA instead of a
>> sepparated ID for shadow CVQ and shadow temporal vrings.
>>
> And with _F_STATE implementation I sent long ago.
>
> Based on this, my suggestion is:
> * Leave the late enable for vDPA devices.
> * Make them fail if the vDPA parent device does not support it. This
> can be considered as a fix.
> * Leave _F_RING_RESET to be added on top, as the semantics are not
> implemented in vDPA at the moment.
>
> Would that work?
I think it can work, let's start from late enabling which seems
lightweight than reset and see. We can leave the vp_vdpa to be done on
top with another series.
Thanks
>
>> [1] Message-id: <20230706191227.835526-1-eperezma@redhat.com>
>> [2] https://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2023-07/msg01325.html
>>
>> Eugenio Pérez (12):
>> vhost: add vhost_reset_queue_op
>> vhost: add vhost_restart_queue_op
>> vhost_net: Use ops->vhost_restart_queue in vhost_net_virtqueue_restart
>> vhost_net: Use ops->vhost_reset_queue in vhost_net_virtqueue_reset
>> vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready_internal
>> vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_svq_stop
>> vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_reset_queue
>> vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_svq_start
>> vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_restart_queue
>> vdpa: enable all vqs if the device support RING_RESET feature
>> vdpa: use SVQ to stall dataplane while NIC state is being restored
>> vhost: Allow _F_RING_RESET with shadow virtqueue
>>
>> include/hw/virtio/vhost-backend.h | 6 ++
>> hw/net/vhost_net.c | 16 ++--
>> hw/virtio/vhost-shadow-virtqueue.c | 1 +
>> hw/virtio/vhost-vdpa.c | 139 +++++++++++++++++++++--------
>> net/vhost-vdpa.c | 55 ++++++++++--
>> hw/virtio/trace-events | 2 +-
>> 6 files changed, 171 insertions(+), 48 deletions(-)
>>
>> --
>> 2.39.3
>>
>>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2023-07-25 7:16 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 25+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2023-07-20 18:14 [RFC PATCH 00/12] Prefer to use SVQ to stall dataplane at NIC state restore through CVQ Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 01/12] vhost: add vhost_reset_queue_op Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 02/12] vhost: add vhost_restart_queue_op Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 03/12] vhost_net: Use ops->vhost_restart_queue in vhost_net_virtqueue_restart Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-25 7:07 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 04/12] vhost_net: Use ops->vhost_reset_queue in vhost_net_virtqueue_reset Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-25 7:08 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 05/12] vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_set_vring_ready_internal Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 06/12] vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_svq_stop Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 07/12] vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_reset_queue Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-21 21:56 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-07-24 16:35 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 08/12] vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_svq_start Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 09/12] vdpa: add vhost_vdpa_restart_queue Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 10/12] vdpa: enable all vqs if the device support RING_RESET feature Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 11/12] vdpa: use SVQ to stall dataplane while NIC state is being restored Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-21 22:58 ` Si-Wei Liu
2023-07-24 19:59 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-07-25 3:48 ` Jason Wang
2023-07-20 18:14 ` [RFC PATCH 12/12] vhost: Allow _F_RING_RESET with shadow virtqueue Eugenio Pérez
2023-07-21 6:48 ` [RFC PATCH 00/12] Prefer to use SVQ to stall dataplane at NIC state restore through CVQ Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-07-25 7:15 ` Jason Wang [this message]
2023-07-27 12:53 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
2023-07-27 13:05 ` Michael S. Tsirkin
2023-07-27 15:23 ` Eugenio Perez Martin
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=18f8d9c7-fa1d-7e45-82cc-7bd742ec18fd@redhat.com \
--to=jasowang@redhat.com \
--cc=dtatulea@nvidia.com \
--cc=eperezma@redhat.com \
--cc=mst@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=si-wei.liu@oracle.com \
--cc=snelson@pensando.io \
--cc=yvugenfi@redhat.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).