From: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
To: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>,
qemu-block@nongnu.org
Cc: kwolf@redhat.com, fam@euphon.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org,
mreitz@redhat.com, stefanha@redhat.com, den@openvz.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 9/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: bdrv_make_zero
Date: Fri, 1 May 2020 17:08:01 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <191f526c-2fb3-d7d3-cf79-df0780e8ee22@redhat.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <20200427143907.5710-10-vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
On 4/27/20 9:39 AM, Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy wrote:
> It's safer to expand in_flight request to start before enter to
> coroutine in synchronous wrappers and end after BDRV_POLL_WHILE loop.
> Note that qemu_coroutine_enter may only schedule the coroutine in some
> circumstances.
See my wording suggestions earlier in the series.
>
> bdrv_make_zero update includes refactoring: move the whole loop into
> coroutine, which has additional benefit of not create/enter new
> coroutine on each iteration.
>
> Signed-off-by: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
> ---
> block/io.c | 54 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++---
> 1 file changed, 51 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
>
> +int bdrv_make_zero(BdrvChild *child, BdrvRequestFlags flags)
> +{
> + int ret;
> +
> + bdrv_inc_in_flight(child->bs);
> +
> + if (qemu_in_coroutine()) {
> + /* Fast-path if already in coroutine context */
> + ret = bdrv_do_make_zero(child, flags);
> + } else {
> + BdrvDoMakeZeroData data = {
> + .child = child,
> + .flags = flags,
> + .done = false,
Another case where the line '.done = false,' is optional, thanks to C
semantics, but does not hurt to leave it in.
Reviewed-by: Eric Blake <eblake@redhat.com>
--
Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer
Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3226
Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2020-05-01 22:09 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 27+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2020-04-27 14:38 [PATCH v2 0/9] block/io: safer inc/dec in_flight sections Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:38 ` [PATCH v2 1/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_is_allocated_above to run only one coroutine Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 21:25 ` Eric Blake
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 2/9] block/io: refactor bdrv_co_ioctl: move aio stuff to corresponding block Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 3/9] block/io: move flush and pdiscard stuff down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 4/9] block/io: move bdrv_rw_co_entry and friends down Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 5/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: simple cases Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 21:43 ` Eric Blake
2020-05-06 7:02 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-18 18:21 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 10:52 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 11:06 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 11:16 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 11:25 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 14:01 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 14:33 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-05-19 16:54 ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-19 11:04 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 6/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:00 ` Eric Blake
2020-05-19 10:57 ` Kevin Wolf
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 7/9] block/io: add bdrv_do_pwrite_zeroes Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:05 ` Eric Blake
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 8/9] block/io: move bdrv_make_zero under block-status Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-04-27 14:39 ` [PATCH v2 9/9] block/io: expand in_flight inc/dec section: bdrv_make_zero Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2020-05-01 22:08 ` Eric Blake [this message]
2020-05-19 11:18 ` [PATCH v2 0/9] block/io: safer inc/dec in_flight sections Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=191f526c-2fb3-d7d3-cf79-df0780e8ee22@redhat.com \
--to=eblake@redhat.com \
--cc=den@openvz.org \
--cc=fam@euphon.net \
--cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
--cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
--cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
--cc=stefanha@redhat.com \
--cc=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).