From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([208.118.235.92]:58468)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1ULEuX-0007JR-B2
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:38:43 -0400
Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1ULEuV-0005Kz-8w
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:38:41 -0400
Received: from mx3-phx2.redhat.com ([209.132.183.24]:50629)
	by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71)
	(envelope-from <pbonzini@redhat.com>) id 1ULEuV-0005Km-00
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:38:39 -0400
Date: Thu, 28 Mar 2013 11:38:36 -0400 (EDT)
From: Paolo Bonzini <pbonzini@redhat.com>
Message-ID: <1953864040.16600354.1364485116864.JavaMail.root@redhat.com>
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA_rjkCYYgf-URR+UuzHMgQVc_umj7widwevptB-o2Y4aA@mail.gmail.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8
Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v3 0/5] Remove sysbus_add_memory and
 sysbus_del_memory
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/options/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.nongnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <https://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>
Cc: Anthony Liguori <aliguori@us.ibm.com>, patches@linaro.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org, Michael Walle <michael@walle.cc>, Jan Kiszka <jan.kiszka@web.de>, Andreas =?utf-8?Q?F=C3=A4rber?= <afaerber@suse.de>


> On 28 March 2013 15:15, Andreas F=C3=A4rber <afaerber@suse.de> wrote:
> > Am 28.03.2013 12:25, schrieb Peter Maydell:
> >> Ping!
> >
> > All patches have at least one Reviewed-by or Acked-by including
> > that of
> > the lm32 maintainer, so you could just apply these to
> > arm-devs.next, no?
>=20
> Well, I could, but they're not really arm patches and I kind of
> feel like one of the reasons my pullreqs are accepted is because
> I don't stuff unrelated patches into them.

If that is your worry, you could just request a pull from a different
branch than usual.

Paolo