From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:33724) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a70v4-0000Ci-Nh for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:06:08 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a70v0-0003DM-Jy for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:06:02 -0500 Received: from lvps176-28-13-145.dedicated.hosteurope.de ([176.28.13.145]:58758) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1a70v0-0003D9-EI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 10 Dec 2015 08:05:58 -0500 From: Tim Sander Date: Thu, 10 Dec 2015 14:05:26 +0100 Message-ID: <1961648.Ujpy5XNBCF@dabox> In-Reply-To: <566976CB.9070307@siemens.com> References: <29597206.QFPkAPGnES@dabox> <566976CB.9070307@siemens.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7Bit Content-Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu AT24Cxx List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Hi Jan Am Donnerstag, 10. Dezember 2015, 13:57:47 schrieb Jan Kiszka: > > I have seen your patches for AT24Cxx functionality in qemu: > > https://lists.gnu.org/archive/html/qemu-devel/2013-04/msg05714.html > > > > As i am interested in this work i am wondering what happend to this > > effort? > > Internally in heavy use (not sure right now if it is being rebased > frequently, though), but we lost the energy to finally push it upstream. > What was missing was probably "only" some proper qtest unit tests. If > you want to pick up on this, that would be very welcome. Beeing pretty new to hacking qemu i won't promise anything but i would give it a shot. > I may have some hours to look into it again as well, though possibly not > this year any more (yeah...). Sounds good, i am not in a particular hurry but if you could send your most recent state of this work this year i would appreciate it, as i have still some hours left this year. Best regards Tim