Re: [PATCH-for-8.0 v2 2/2] target/arm/pauth: Inline pauth_param_mask() and pauth_ptr_mask()

[Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>]

On 3/28/23 06:30, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
> diff --git a/target/arm/internals.h b/target/arm/internals.h
> index 673519a24a..a617466fa8 100644
> --- a/target/arm/internals.h
> +++ b/target/arm/internals.h
> @@ -1389,6 +1389,14 @@ int exception_target_el(CPUARMState *env);
>   bool arm_singlestep_active(CPUARMState *env);
>   bool arm_generate_debug_exceptions(CPUARMState *env);
>   
> +static inline uint64_t pauth_param_mask(ARMVAParameters param)

Perhaps pauth_ptr_mask_param, or just pauth_ptr_mask (see below).

> +static inline uint64_t pauth_ptr_mask(CPUARMState *env, uint64_t ptr, bool data)
> +{
> +    ARMMMUIdx mmu_idx = arm_stage1_mmu_idx(env);
> +    ARMVAParameters param = aa64_va_parameters(env, ptr, mmu_idx, data);
> +
> +    return pauth_param_mask(param);
> +}

This is only used by gdbstub.  Just put it there.  Perhaps merge it with 
aarch64_gdb_get_pauth_reg directly, so that we can use the simpler 'pauth_ptr_mask' name 
above.


Either way,
Reviewed-by: Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@linaro.org>


r~