From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:34846) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emyDt-0006bV-8O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 03:52:00 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1emyDo-000436-DO for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 17 Feb 2018 03:51:57 -0500 Sender: Paolo Bonzini References: <20180216121810.56ed961e.cohuck@redhat.com> <8b721785-5581-8936-2517-1fa00db3dabd@redhat.com> <4a71adf2-f617-74c2-cf7e-34517ac6aade@redhat.com> <20180216170904.5933125f.cohuck@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <19e61baf-0efe-5ff4-5070-3953191ae6e3@redhat.com> Date: Sat, 17 Feb 2018 09:51:48 +0100 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <20180216170904.5933125f.cohuck@redhat.com> Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [Process] QEMU submaintainers and pull requests List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Cornelia Huck Cc: Peter Maydell , qemu-s390x , QEMU Developers On 16/02/2018 17:09, Cornelia Huck wrote: >> BTW, Fam and I are also planning to improve Patchew so that it is better >> at detecting pull requests and especially merged pull requests. > > Cool. > > Would a certain formatting be helpful for patchew as well? Or do you > plan to parse the cover letter to hopefully find the output of git > request-pull and get the correct base from that? Yes, basically replace "git am" with "git fetch" if the cover letter has a line that looks like it's produced by "git request-pull". Paolo