From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-5.2 required=3.0 tests=BAYES_00,DKIM_INVALID, DKIM_SIGNED,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI,NICE_REPLY_A, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 049EAC433DB for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:40:57 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 3BDFB20E65 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 13:40:56 +0000 (UTC) DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 3BDFB20E65 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:51030 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Um7-0002h6-8G for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:40:55 -0500 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:39388) by lists.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_GCM_SHA384:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Ujo-0001lS-1C for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:38:32 -0500 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.124]:26411) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.2:ECDHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:256) (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1l1Ujm-0006sw-DX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:38:31 -0500 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1610977109; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=UKjFrMvuGBpNNEAuCW2/5ZWaSZhusGHfA/4nuKOHe6Y=; b=Ma4FsNi8VenuXJEYWx0o5FYcoR5G3ovx4WV3zmQ9JoXugu4wVrhD7+njSlf5dL8uCIXFrL GnXhU215RaKxGmMTJNPZW290Yv48I3AHKP1i0HFxzhW+HSP82R+QhBvJqdVxzg+HqYLVLj X7Dd8ROm2QBiUejHgJEEqBt6U21kaCU= Received: from mail-wr1-f70.google.com (mail-wr1-f70.google.com [209.85.221.70]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-48-P4Vip_rBNQaUz-Lct19u6w-1; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 08:38:27 -0500 X-MC-Unique: P4Vip_rBNQaUz-Lct19u6w-1 Received: by mail-wr1-f70.google.com with SMTP id w8so8294308wrv.18 for ; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:38:27 -0800 (PST) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=UKjFrMvuGBpNNEAuCW2/5ZWaSZhusGHfA/4nuKOHe6Y=; b=ZBuUkmZgvOaR9t8TZpNSUnqQ6BR7VgCkEaf0R5L7LBnFFhWUyduZ9HSP0TSN2coiEN YIB4ihmr6eDd06WqcSvkBfOqaJPjNk1ZrmWpIbVzhDRBA7dDqCmpBofIs7SONsOB6NCC w5BPbZcqUDiVg8L6L67YAfXc6tkBfdcKqbMxVmGvqpMvRJASylzj1cDnSMvC0niPp8ci FdKFr1yn2xbdouo/RA6Xh/bf4RXqdOqjeQ7mBaVJpKdv3VsPDz/nxGsrNBdjQsVfIRHv +PY0mUEuEd6S1tDCraZI1W3G16OM28qgdaUL41VYa1xGzj6VqB/gYQzrugri3thWb0Vz 3/Qg== X-Gm-Message-State: AOAM533rO3JgYiSqhgowjiiLV0RVFq3dwxuUa/WbuypAHmYBlBZyCgH8 acwwrnsGvQiJmii//Rd1+pjKcgrMhEZjUfPeQTH/d4RYAurIZTzCmOk5rpbejIT9A8MoEyO2Jb4 muB0rCbQvNirnnQs= X-Received: by 2002:adf:e84c:: with SMTP id d12mr26971102wrn.382.1610977106171; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:38:26 -0800 (PST) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ABdhPJy4FZ3V0hLw/tXQHVsFbdSGO7qw1UExkmSFKi3gJAGsWNiEjQJgGnJGGa/IZgkDupW485TAeA== X-Received: by 2002:adf:e84c:: with SMTP id d12mr26971081wrn.382.1610977105946; Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:38:25 -0800 (PST) Received: from ?IPv6:2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a? ([2001:b07:6468:f312:c8dd:75d4:99ab:290a]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id b10sm11857715wmj.2.2021.01.18.05.38.24 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Mon, 18 Jan 2021 05:38:24 -0800 (PST) Subject: Re: pending fuzzing patches (was Re: [PATCH 2/2] fuzz: log the arguments used to initialize QEMU) To: Thomas Huth , Alexander Bulekov , qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <20210117201014.271610-1-alxndr@bu.edu> <20210117201014.271610-3-alxndr@bu.edu> <4e63a37a-d9f1-7841-3761-6f8cd7ac9051@redhat.com> <84615bb8-564e-5d5f-b134-83fa223cf583@redhat.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <19fa6cfc-3d26-02bd-44c1-be710d3fa8a2@redhat.com> Date: Mon, 18 Jan 2021 14:38:23 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:78.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/78.6.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <84615bb8-564e-5d5f-b134-83fa223cf583@redhat.com> Authentication-Results: relay.mimecast.com; auth=pass smtp.auth=CUSA124A263 smtp.mailfrom=pbonzini@redhat.com X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: 8bit Received-SPF: pass client-ip=63.128.21.124; envelope-from=pbonzini@redhat.com; helo=us-smtp-delivery-124.mimecast.com X-Spam_score_int: -31 X-Spam_score: -3.2 X-Spam_bar: --- X-Spam_report: (-3.2 / 5.0 requ) BAYES_00=-1.9, DKIMWL_WL_HIGH=-0.175, DKIM_SIGNED=0.1, DKIM_VALID=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_AU=-0.1, DKIM_VALID_EF=-0.1, NICE_REPLY_A=-0.194, RCVD_IN_DNSWL_LOW=-0.7, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_H4=0.001, RCVD_IN_MSPIKE_WL=0.001, SPF_HELO_NONE=0.001, SPF_PASS=-0.001 autolearn=ham autolearn_force=no X-Spam_action: no action X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Laurent Vivier , Peter Maydell , Bandan Das , Stefan Hajnoczi Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 18/01/21 10:30, Thomas Huth wrote: >> >> Hi Alexander, can you send _me_ a pull request for all the pending >> fuzzing patches?  I haven't paid much attention, but I have seen >> external contributions and I have the feeling that they aren't being >> applied/reviewed promptly. > > I'm normally taking the fuzzing patches through the qtest tree (and also > merged some contributions last week, see 22ec0c696fd28e and the > following commits) ... which patch series that got missed did you have > in mind? I was thinking mostly of "fuzz: improve crash case minimization" which I had lost track of, but that one has been merged. Paolo > Anyway, the amount of fuzzer patches seems to have increased during the > last weeks, and I'm not very familiar with the fuzzing stuff and also > sometimes I do not get CC:-ed on fuzzing patches, so it might make sense > indeed that Alexander now gathers the fuzzing patches and starts sending > pull requests for these. Alexander, do you want to have a try now? > >  Thomas