From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.43) id 1NnCux-0000kK-Ml for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:24:51 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (port=52540 helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.43) id 1NnCux-0000jz-8a for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:24:51 -0500 Received: from Debian-exim by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NnCuv-0003U8-21 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:24:50 -0500 Received: from mail-ew0-f219.google.com ([209.85.219.219]:62518) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.60) (envelope-from ) id 1NnCuu-0003TB-3r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 10:24:48 -0500 Received: by ewy19 with SMTP id 19so2938785ewy.2 for ; Thu, 04 Mar 2010 07:24:44 -0800 (PST) MIME-Version: 1.0 Sender: niels@nixpanic.net In-Reply-To: <4B8EF79E.1000201@cisco.com> References: <4B7915B4.6040305@siemens.com> <1b51b6f81003011230pc6e5238odc48948a617e261f@mail.gmail.com> <4B8C2EFF.3030106@web.de> <4B8CED08.2030705@redhat.com> <1b51b6f81003030321g6a3eb47ak6a59267cae50b7f2@mail.gmail.com> <4B8EE632.7090303@cisco.com> <4B8EF509.4030409@web.de> <4B8EF79E.1000201@cisco.com> Date: Thu, 4 Mar 2010 15:24:44 +0000 Message-ID: <1b51b6f81003040724r33dafe5dqa89fb213a495f877@mail.gmail.com> Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: EHCI support in QEMU From: Niels de Vos Content-Type: text/plain; charset=UTF-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Jan Kiszka , "David S. Ahern" Cc: Taimoor Mirza , Kevin Wolf , qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Mar 3, 2010 at 11:58 PM, David S. Ahern wrote: > On 03/03/2010 04:47 PM, Jan Kiszka wrote: >> >> Thanks for your work, David and Niels! I assume that David based this on >> Niels' patch, so there is nothing to be merged? David's version built >> for me, so I pushed >> >> =C2=A0 =C2=A0 =C2=A0 git://git.kiszka.org/qemu.git ehci >> >> So far it's supposed to be a reference for anyone interested in this >> topic, willing to test or even to hack on it. I will collect and merge >> improvements as they are sent to the list. >> >> Jan >> > > Yes, I took Niels post as a start. Addressed a few white space issues, > made some of the initializations parallel the uhci code and removed the > mem_base from the read/write functions (causing segfaults due to > outbounds referencing -- addr > MMIO_SIZE -- and do not appear to be > needed). Hi David and Jan, thanks, sounds really cool! I don't have any knowledge about the qemu internals, therefore the details would be too difficult for me anyway :) I'll keep an eye on the progress, and maybe I'll be able to test and contribute a it more later on. Cheers, Niels