From: "mar.krzeminski" <mar.krzeminski@gmail.com>
To: Peter Maydell <peter.maydell@linaro.org>,
Jean-Christophe Dubois <jcd@tribudubois.net>
Cc: QEMU Developers <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] [i.MX] fix CS handling during SPI access.
Date: Mon, 9 Jan 2017 20:04:55 +0100 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <1be7123c-acee-7d16-8a10-c8965d5805ff@gmail.com> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <CAFEAcA8dwhoSZTWS9JJ6-vSUs1Asw8ymktmD+oOqx0DNpCV2XQ@mail.gmail.com>
W dniu 09.01.2017 o 11:46, Peter Maydell pisze:
> On 4 January 2017 at 22:06, Jean-Christophe Dubois <jcd@tribudubois.net> wrote:
>> The i.MX SPI device was not de-asserting the CS line at the end of
>> memory access.
>>
>> This triggered a SIGSEGV in Qemu when the sabrelite emulator was acessing
>> a SPI flash memory.
>>
>> Whith this path the CS signal is correctly asserted and deasserted arround
>> memory access.
>>
>> Assertion level is now based on SPI device configuration.
>>
>> This was tested by:
>> * booting linux on Sabrelite Qemu emulator.
>> * booting xvisor on Sabrelite Qemu emultor.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: Jean-Christophe Dubois <jcd@tribudubois.net>
>> Acked-by: Marcin Krzemiński <mar.krzeminski@gmail.com>
>> static void imx_spi_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>> {
>> IMXSPIState *s = IMX_SPI(dev);
>> + uint32_t i;
>>
>> DPRINTF("\n");
>>
>> @@ -243,6 +263,11 @@ static void imx_spi_reset(DeviceState *dev)
>> imx_spi_update_irq(s);
>>
>> s->burst_length = 0;
>> +
>> + /* Disable all CS lines */
>> + for (i = 0; i < 4; i++) {
>> + qemu_set_irq(s->cs_lines[i], !imx_spi_channel_pol(s, i));
>> + }
> Calling qemu_set_irq() in a device reset function is a bit
> tricky, because in a full system reset the device at the other
> end might have already reset or might not, and calling into
> its handler function for the irq line change might provoke
> an unwanted change of its state. We don't really have a coherent
> model here but for the moment we just try to avoid calling
> set_irq in a reset method.
JC, if you remove qemu_set_irq() call from reset, at least m25p80 behavior
should not change since m25p80 reset handler will reset it's whole
internal state.
Thanks,
Marcin
>
> thanks
> -- PMM
>
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2017-01-09 19:05 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 12+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2017-01-04 22:06 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH v4] [i.MX] fix CS handling during SPI access Jean-Christophe Dubois
2017-01-09 10:46 ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-09 19:04 ` mar.krzeminski [this message]
2017-01-09 19:06 ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-09 20:05 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2017-01-09 21:19 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2017-01-09 21:45 ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-09 22:27 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2017-01-09 23:02 ` Peter Maydell
2017-01-11 16:12 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
2017-01-11 18:08 ` mar.krzeminski
2017-01-11 18:47 ` Jean-Christophe DUBOIS
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=1be7123c-acee-7d16-8a10-c8965d5805ff@gmail.com \
--to=mar.krzeminski@gmail.com \
--cc=jcd@tribudubois.net \
--cc=peter.maydell@linaro.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).