Re: [PATCH v2 0/3] vhost: memslot handling improvements

[David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com>]

On 20.04.23 16:28, Igor Mammedov wrote:
> On Thu, 16 Mar 2023 16:36:55 +0100
> David Hildenbrand <david@redhat.com> wrote:
> 
>> Following up on my previous work to make virtio-mem consume multiple
>> memslots dynamically [1] that requires precise accounting between used vs.
>> reserved memslots, I realized that vhost makes this extra hard by
>> filtering out some memory region sections (so they don't consume a
>> memslot) in the vhost-user case, which messes up the whole memslot
>> accounting.
>>
>> This series fixes what I found to be broken and prepares for more work on
>> [1]. Further, it cleanes up the merge checks that I consider unnecessary.
> 
> Acked-by: Igor Mammedov <imammedo@redhat.com>

Thanks Igor!

@MST, do you want to these patches (I can resend in case it's easier to 
fixup the typo in patch #3).

Alternatively, I could send these patches along with another 
memory-backend patch I have queued.

-- 
Thanks,

David / dhildenb