From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:4830:134:3::10]:58932) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fno7R-00046t-0i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 12:49:03 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fno7N-0002Se-Ud for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 12:49:01 -0400 Received: from mx3-rdu2.redhat.com ([66.187.233.73]:45620 helo=mx1.redhat.com) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1fno7N-0002SM-PP for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 09 Aug 2018 12:48:57 -0400 References: <1533796396-20483-1-git-send-email-whois.zihan.yang@gmail.com> From: Eric Blake Message-ID: <1cf87364-5a10-bf64-dbfa-981456ecf365@redhat.com> Date: Thu, 9 Aug 2018 11:48:56 -0500 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8; format=flowed Content-Language: en-US Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [RFC v4 1/6] pci_expander_bridge: add type TYPE_PXB_PCIE_HOST List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Zihan Yang Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, "Michael S. Tsirkin" , Marcel Apfelbaum On 08/09/2018 11:39 AM, Zihan Yang wrote: > Eric Blake =E4=BA=8E2018=E5=B9=B48=E6=9C=889=E6=97=A5= =E5=91=A8=E5=9B=9B =E4=B8=8B=E5=8D=889:23=E5=86=99=E9=81=93=EF=BC=9A >> >> On 08/09/2018 01:33 AM, Zihan Yang wrote: >>> The inner host bridge created by pxb-pcie is TYPE_PXB_PCI_HOST by def= ault, >>> change it to a new type TYPE_PXB_PCIE_HOST to better utilize ECAM of = PCIe >> >> meta-comment: >> >> Your messages came through unthreaded (seven separate threads), rather >> than properly marked 'References:' and 'In-reply-to:' to the 0/6 cover >> letter <1533796115-15837-1-git-send-email-whois.zihan.yang@gmail.com>, >> which makes it a bit harder to keep track of the conversation when >> viewing mails sorted by threads with most recent activity. >=20 > My mistake, I manually added the cc of cover letter, which is not > covered by cccmd, > but I didn't add In-reply-to of remaining mails. I will directly add > an "cc: " field in cover > letter and send them all in later patches to avoid breaking them up. >=20 > As for this patch set, should I resend them or save it to v5, which I > will try working out > this weekend? At this point, it's probably still worth waiting for any comments on v4,=20 so that v5 can fix those issues. --=20 Eric Blake, Principal Software Engineer Red Hat, Inc. +1-919-301-3266 Virtualization: qemu.org | libvirt.org