qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy <vsementsov@virtuozzo.com>
To: qemu block <qemu-block@nongnu.org>
Cc: Kevin Wolf <kwolf@redhat.com>, Denis Lunev <den@virtuozzo.com>,
	qemu-devel <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>, Max Reitz <mreitz@redhat.com>
Subject: qcow2 api not secured by mutex lock
Date: Wed, 18 Dec 2019 10:28:48 +0000	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <1ea7f93d-8f48-d565-70e7-0d66f1b80c1e@virtuozzo.com> (raw)

[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 1522 bytes --]

Hi!

Some time ago, we've faced and fixed the fact that qcow2 bitmap api doesn't
call qcow2_co_mutex_lock, before accessing qcow2 metadata. This was solved by
moving qcow2_co_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap and
qcow2_co_can_store_new_dirty_bitmap to coroutine and call qcow2_co_mutex_lock.

Now I decided to look at big picture (it is attached).

Boxes are qcow2 driver api, green border means that function calls qcow2_co_mutex_lock
(it doesn't guarantee, that exactly child node call is locked, but it is something).

In the picture there are just all functions, calling qcow2_cache_get/put.. Not all the
functions, that needs locking, but again, it is something.

So, accordingly to the picture, it seems that the following functions lacks locking:

qcow2_co_create

qcow2_snapshot_*
   (but it is both drained and aio context locked, so should be safe, yes?)

qcow2_reopen_bitmaps_rw
qcow2_store_persistent_dirty_bitmaps

qcow2_amend_options

qcow2_make_empty

===

Checking green nodes:

qcow2_co_invalidate_cache actually calls qcow2_close unlocked, it's another reason to fix qcow2_store_persistent_dirty_bitmaps

qcow2_write_snapshots actually called unlocked from qcow2_check_fix_snapshot_table.. It seems unsafe.

===


Not complete audit of course.. What do you think about it? I think, I at least should move
qcow2_store_persistent_dirty_bitmaps and qcow2_reopen_bitmaps_rw to coroutine,
like qcow2_co_remove_persistent_dirty_bitmap.


-- 
Best regards,
Vladimir

[-- Attachment #2: master-block-qcow2-filtered.svg --]
[-- Type: image/svg+xml, Size: 122306 bytes --]

             reply	other threads:[~2019-12-18 10:30 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 6+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2019-12-18 10:28 Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy [this message]
2019-12-19 10:02 ` qcow2 api not secured by mutex lock Kevin Wolf
2019-12-19 10:25   ` Vladimir Sementsov-Ogievskiy
2019-12-19 10:33   ` Max Reitz
2019-12-19 10:35   ` Max Reitz
2019-12-19 10:53     ` Kevin Wolf

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=1ea7f93d-8f48-d565-70e7-0d66f1b80c1e@virtuozzo.com \
    --to=vsementsov@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=den@virtuozzo.com \
    --cc=kwolf@redhat.com \
    --cc=mreitz@redhat.com \
    --cc=qemu-block@nongnu.org \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).