Re: [RFC PATCH v2 19/19] hw/usb: Inline usb_bus_from_device()

["Philippe Mathieu-Daudé" <philmd@linaro.org>]

On 13/2/23 10:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
> On 13/02/2023 09.44, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>> On 13/2/23 09:11, Thomas Huth wrote:
>>> On 13/02/2023 08.08, Philippe Mathieu-Daudé wrote:
>>>> Signed-off-by: Philippe Mathieu-Daudé <philmd@linaro.org>
>>>> ---
>>>> RFC Other devices don't use such helper. Maybe it should
>>>>      be the other way around, introduce more bus_from_device()
>>>>      helpers?
>>>> ---
>>>>   hw/usb/bus.c        | 10 +++++-----
>>>>   hw/usb/core.c       |  6 +++---
>>>>   hw/usb/dev-hub.c    |  4 ++--
>>>>   hw/usb/dev-serial.c | 10 +++++-----
>>>>   hw/usb/hcd-xhci.c   |  2 +-
>>>>   include/hw/usb.h    |  5 -----
>>>>   6 files changed, 16 insertions(+), 21 deletions(-)
>>>>
>>>> diff --git a/hw/usb/bus.c b/hw/usb/bus.c
>>>> index d7c3c71435..4a1b67761c 100644
>>>> --- a/hw/usb/bus.c
>>>> +++ b/hw/usb/bus.c
>>>> @@ -427,7 +427,7 @@ void usb_unregister_port(USBBus *bus, USBPort 
>>>> *port)
>>>>   void usb_claim_port(USBDevice *dev, Error **errp)
>>>>   {
>>>> -    USBBus *bus = usb_bus_from_device(dev);
>>>> +    USBBus *bus = USB_BUS(qdev_get_parent_bus(DEVICE(dev)));
>>>
>>> You're certainly missing a proper justification in the patch 
>>> description here. The "other devices don't use such a helper" does 
>>> not sound like a real justification to me, since the code lines 
>>> rather get longer this way. Thus this rather looks like unnecessary 
>>> code churn to me --> rather drop the patch?
>>
>> The idea is to avoid having 7 different ways of implementing something
>> with 3 different APIs and 2 unfinished API conversions in flight.
> 
> Ok, then please add such information to the patch description.
> 
>> I'm wondering if the QOM DECLARE_xxx() macros could also define some
>> xxx_BUS_FROM_DEV() or xxx_PARENT_BUS() macros. So here it would become:
>>
>>      USBBus *bus = USB_PARENT_BUS(dev);
> 
> Sounds more readable at a first glance, but when looking at the output of:
> 
>    grep -r '(qdev_get_parent_bus' hw/
> 
> it seems like there aren't that many other places using this pattern 
> (many places rather use BUS() instead), so it's maybe hard to justify 
> such a change.

There is another helper, scsi_bus_from_device(), but is only used
twice. The previous patch "hw/scsi/scsi-bus: Inline two uses of
scsi_bus_from_device()" remove it.

 > Thus I think your patch here is likely the better
 > solution right now (when you add a proper patch description).

OK, thanks!