From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Return-Path: X-Spam-Checker-Version: SpamAssassin 3.4.0 (2014-02-07) on aws-us-west-2-korg-lkml-1.web.codeaurora.org X-Spam-Level: X-Spam-Status: No, score=-2.4 required=3.0 tests=DKIMWL_WL_HIGH,DKIM_SIGNED, DKIM_VALID,DKIM_VALID_AU,HEADER_FROM_DIFFERENT_DOMAINS,MAILING_LIST_MULTI, SPF_HELO_NONE,SPF_PASS,USER_AGENT_SANE_1 autolearn=no autolearn_force=no version=3.4.0 Received: from mail.kernel.org (mail.kernel.org [198.145.29.99]) by smtp.lore.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTP id 34D71C18E5B for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Received: from lists.gnu.org (lists.gnu.org [209.51.188.17]) (using TLSv1.2 with cipher ECDHE-RSA-AES256-GCM-SHA384 (256/256 bits)) (No client certificate requested) by mail.kernel.org (Postfix) with ESMTPS id 046F120663 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 10:37:15 +0000 (UTC) Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dkim=pass (1024-bit key) header.d=redhat.com header.i=@redhat.com header.b="dAf51rom" DMARC-Filter: OpenDMARC Filter v1.3.2 mail.kernel.org 046F120663 Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; dmarc=fail (p=none dis=none) header.from=redhat.com Authentication-Results: mail.kernel.org; spf=pass smtp.mailfrom=qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Received: from localhost ([::1]:56240 helo=lists1p.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jE9b0-0006ba-12 for qemu-devel@archiver.kernel.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:37:14 -0400 Received: from eggs.gnu.org ([2001:470:142:3::10]:43410) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.90_1) (envelope-from ) id 1jE9Rt-0001TX-DU for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:27:51 -0400 Received: from Debian-exim by eggs.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jE9Rs-0001Z4-Cj for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:27:49 -0400 Received: from us-smtp-delivery-74.mimecast.com ([63.128.21.74]:55217) by eggs.gnu.org with esmtps (TLS1.0:DHE_RSA_AES_256_CBC_SHA1:32) (Exim 4.71) (envelope-from ) id 1jE9Rs-0001Si-7n for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:27:48 -0400 DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=redhat.com; s=mimecast20190719; t=1584440867; h=from:from:reply-to:subject:subject:date:date:message-id:message-id: to:to:cc:cc:mime-version:mime-version:content-type:content-type: content-transfer-encoding:content-transfer-encoding: in-reply-to:in-reply-to:references:references; bh=Es5YNMuYHbD/0Pj7xxHy+DX/ynr1OuFYkFxd50kqhS0=; b=dAf51romkAXcuS7cLzABNz7EFc+gyAQxtdT89v6RvxY9+bhBT1eGFAnVQ1gd2fKG22+dmy swUt2LrH40Z9UeS65olUxyQ4lODKX6r+6ZttV0AG6ryr7r2M0e9ss4Is5xlrxLTfGxkH8h Z0y6DS3wnCxnY+TPVCjobZqwrJ+NzjA= Received: from mail-wm1-f71.google.com (mail-wm1-f71.google.com [209.85.128.71]) (Using TLS) by relay.mimecast.com with ESMTP id us-mta-224-03kzja2nNYeL4Igv-H18Xw-1; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 06:27:43 -0400 X-MC-Unique: 03kzja2nNYeL4Igv-H18Xw-1 Received: by mail-wm1-f71.google.com with SMTP id a23so6951167wmm.8 for ; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:27:43 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-DKIM-Signature: v=1; a=rsa-sha256; c=relaxed/relaxed; d=1e100.net; s=20161025; h=x-gm-message-state:subject:to:cc:references:from:message-id:date :user-agent:mime-version:in-reply-to:content-language :content-transfer-encoding; bh=b4ue4HBlk0wlprqmw7rP19D9WyYBfZS5Z5GORIUm+VY=; b=KR4QmyLV9m1iywwMPCEreYtdaGmCPRZdIXZEEJVjHtTqHDsZV8RiKkauOJMYZnb4AP X3wW5KIeM3vCq3K+stFj4wYaEBmNPdCnh+aZHdLf5NmG6seHjtzAtRnq3bVJWiRkfMjY xxWMMxJDO949bPEAZnJi4S+7RLNg2AiyKbHMPtkcqAqPE3kr4JfR0zZOLnTDz62tB5DZ HbWCxYwHsjsh0Y18DvfnF5FfMCN1jzvqx6LWSzm5GKuY3ZJECFvxt9y4OoCd2MwJFAY4 15cRfERKr01jer07IWKFsJgu07obZ4PhS7LKcIpzrvXmDtw6VHtOd5bZn2wvae5PsRod p/pA== X-Gm-Message-State: ANhLgQ2LkZuQPLKHWVzSFwP7nXrZo5RcwQEXB2fhx8AZRro/ZfVN7QES xmELl25h2kyI6ZfnHJtone0FXbF49yJuRlcQ8wIWvfLENCvYmCFmdVLy/hpXoTc/FGsb6mDKZYf yf05QS9f+QKnw0j8= X-Received: by 2002:a5d:44c1:: with SMTP id z1mr5129193wrr.315.1584440862701; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:27:42 -0700 (PDT) X-Google-Smtp-Source: ADFU+vvif/Qj3ow192LmueaosfhLd4VY5SCXjrAi4CUKAdHNUIU93WQZPO4824p1dOOY3XXcUTocfQ== X-Received: by 2002:a5d:44c1:: with SMTP id z1mr5129178wrr.315.1584440862475; Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:27:42 -0700 (PDT) Received: from [192.168.178.58] ([151.21.15.227]) by smtp.gmail.com with ESMTPSA id i21sm3449926wmb.23.2020.03.17.03.27.41 (version=TLS1_3 cipher=TLS_AES_128_GCM_SHA256 bits=128/128); Tue, 17 Mar 2020 03:27:41 -0700 (PDT) Subject: Re: [PULL 09/61] MAINTAINERS: Add entry for Guest X86 HAXM CPUs To: Colin.Xu@intel.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org References: <1584394048-44994-1-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <1584394048-44994-10-git-send-email-pbonzini@redhat.com> <41756673-bbd4-593f-ade8-3232db8b512e@intel.com> From: Paolo Bonzini Message-ID: <1eead546-c06f-2ec0-e3b7-fdc5bb426620@redhat.com> Date: Tue, 17 Mar 2020 11:27:41 +0100 User-Agent: Mozilla/5.0 (X11; Linux x86_64; rv:68.0) Gecko/20100101 Thunderbird/68.5.0 MIME-Version: 1.0 In-Reply-To: <41756673-bbd4-593f-ade8-3232db8b512e@intel.com> Content-Language: en-US X-Mimecast-Spam-Score: 0 X-Mimecast-Originator: redhat.com Content-Type: text/plain; charset=utf-8 Content-Transfer-Encoding: quoted-printable X-detected-operating-system: by eggs.gnu.org: GNU/Linux 2.2.x-3.x [generic] X-Received-From: 63.128.21.74 X-BeenThere: qemu-devel@nongnu.org X-Mailman-Version: 2.1.23 Precedence: list List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , Cc: Wenchao Wang , Hang Yuan Errors-To: qemu-devel-bounces+qemu-devel=archiver.kernel.org@nongnu.org Sender: "Qemu-devel" On 17/03/20 09:55, Colin Xu wrote: >=20 > On 2020-03-17 16:26, Paolo Bonzini wrote: >> On 17/03/20 08:46, Colin Xu wrote: >>> Hi Paolo, >>> >>> For future HAX patch, once it's "Reviewed-by" haxm maintainers and othe= r >>> reviewers, do we need "SubmitAPullRequest" separately or you will do it >>> together with other patches? >> As you prefer.=C2=A0 I wouldn't mind having to send fewer pull requests.= :) >> >> Paolo >=20 > Would you mind continue help HAX send pull request? It feels like easier > to track the changes when stay together with other accelerator patches. > We'll regularly check the reviewed patches and do necessary tests, and > send you a list of patches that can be queued for next pull. >=20 > What do you think? Sure, that's okay. The number of patches is low enough. Paolo