Re: [PATCH 4/9] hw/arm/aspeed: add Qualcomm Firework machine and FRU device

["Cédric Le Goater" <clg@kaod.org>]

On 6/22/22 19:28, Jae Hyun Yoo wrote:
> From: Graeme Gregory <quic_ggregory@quicinc.com>
> 
> Add base for Qualcomm Firework machine and add its FRU device which is
> defined by DC-SCM to be fixed address 0x50.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Graeme Gregory <quic_ggregory@quicinc.com>
> ---
>   hw/arm/aspeed.c | 53 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++++
>   1 file changed, 53 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/hw/arm/aspeed.c b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
> index 36d6b2c33e48..0e6edd2be4fa 100644
> --- a/hw/arm/aspeed.c
> +++ b/hw/arm/aspeed.c
> @@ -1017,6 +1017,35 @@ static void qcom_dc_scm_bmc_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState *bmc)
>       qcom_dc_scm_fru_init(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 15), 0x53, 128 * 1024);
>   }
>   
> +static void qcom_firework_fru_init(I2CBus *bus, uint8_t addr, uint32_t rsize)
> +{
> +    I2CSlave *i2c_dev = i2c_slave_new("at24c-eeprom", addr);
> +    DeviceState *dev = DEVICE(i2c_dev);
> +    /* Use First Index for DC-SCM FRU */
> +    DriveInfo *dinfo = drive_get(IF_NONE, 0, 1);
> +
> +    qdev_prop_set_uint32(dev, "rom-size", rsize);
> +
> +    if (dinfo) {
> +        qdev_prop_set_drive(dev, "drive", blk_by_legacy_dinfo(dinfo));
> +    }
> +
> +    i2c_slave_realize_and_unref(i2c_dev, bus, &error_abort);
> +}
> +
> +static void qcom_dc_scm_firework_i2c_init(AspeedMachineState *bmc)
> +{
> +    AspeedSoCState *soc = &bmc->soc;
> +
> +    /* Create the generic DC-SCM hardware */
> +    qcom_dc_scm_bmc_i2c_init(bmc);
> +
> +    /* Now create the Firework specific hardware */
> +
> +    /* I2C4 */
> +    qcom_firework_fru_init(aspeed_i2c_get_bus(&soc->i2c, 4), 0x50, 128 * 1024);
> +}
> +
>   static bool aspeed_get_mmio_exec(Object *obj, Error **errp)
>   {
>       return ASPEED_MACHINE(obj)->mmio_exec;
> @@ -1489,6 +1518,26 @@ static void aspeed_machine_qcom_dc_scm_v1_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
>           aspeed_soc_num_cpus(amc->soc_name);
>   };
>   
> +static void aspeed_machine_qcom_firework_class_init(ObjectClass *oc,
> +                                                    void *data)
> +{
> +    MachineClass *mc = MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> +    AspeedMachineClass *amc = ASPEED_MACHINE_CLASS(oc);
> +
> +    mc->desc       = "Qualcomm DC-SCM V1/Firework BMC (Cortex A7)";
> +    amc->soc_name  = "ast2600-a3";
> +    amc->hw_strap1 = QCOM_DC_SCM_V1_BMC_HW_STRAP1;
> +    amc->hw_strap2 = QCOM_DC_SCM_V1_BMC_HW_STRAP2;
> +    amc->fmc_model = "n25q512a";
> +    amc->spi_model = "n25q512a";
> +    amc->num_cs    = 2;
> +    amc->macs_mask = ASPEED_MAC2_ON | ASPEED_MAC3_ON;
> +    amc->i2c_init  = qcom_dc_scm_firework_i2c_init;
> +    mc->default_ram_size = 1 * GiB;
> +    mc->default_cpus = mc->min_cpus = mc->max_cpus =
> +        aspeed_soc_num_cpus(amc->soc_name);
> +};
> +
>   static const TypeInfo aspeed_machine_types[] = {
>       {
>           .name          = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("palmetto-bmc"),
> @@ -1534,6 +1583,10 @@ static const TypeInfo aspeed_machine_types[] = {
>           .name          = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("qcom-dc-scm-v1-bmc"),
>           .parent        = TYPE_ASPEED_MACHINE,
>           .class_init    = aspeed_machine_qcom_dc_scm_v1_class_init,
> +    }, {
> +        .name          = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("qcom-firework"),

We should add the "-bmc" prefix to this machine name to be consistent
with the other BMCs. A "qcom-firework" machine would model the whole
system, host side included.

Thanks,

C.

> +        .parent        = TYPE_ASPEED_MACHINE,
> +        .class_init    = aspeed_machine_qcom_firework_class_init,
>       }, {
>           .name          = MACHINE_TYPE_NAME("fp5280g2-bmc"),
>           .parent        = TYPE_ASPEED_MACHINE,