From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19VoDP-0001Wz-N8 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:04:15 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19VoD9-0001Ey-1o for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:03:59 -0400 Received: from host244-0.pool80116.interbusiness.it ([80.116.0.244] helo=dragas.dyndns.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19VoCE-0000Bz-3O for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 04:03:04 -0400 Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:02:34 +0200 From: Stefano Marinelli Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu is a wonderful (and presentation) Message-ID: <20030627080234.GA25354@dragas.dyndns.org> References: <20030626155242.GA20861@dragas.dyndns.org> <3EFB2E1D.8000502@free.fr> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <3EFB2E1D.8000502@free.fr> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Sorry, just read again your mail and found out I've read Guest for Host on the second point, so I wrote a wrong thing... :) On Thu, Jun 26, 2003 at 07:32:13PM +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > who ask it :-) The optimal solution would require a tricky host kernel > patch, but in this case it can be more tempting to use plex86. I don't think so: the plex86 project will remain Linux on x86 Linux, *perhaps* it would be able to launch Linux on *BSD. The qemu idea (of the dynamic translation) could be slower, but surely more portable and with a wider range of usings. So I think that even a host patch can be a good idea. -- ------------------------------------------------- Stefano Marinelli -------------------------------------------------