From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19Vujo-0005R6-TL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 11:02:08 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.20) id 19VudU-0001nf-7r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:55:37 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de ([131.188.30.103]) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.20) id 19Vuby-0000j0-Gb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 10:54:02 -0400 Received: from faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de [131.188.30.103])h5REs16P028185 (version=TLSv1/SSLv3 cipher=DHE-RSA-AES256-SHA bits=256 verify=NO) for ; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Received: (from sithglan@localhost) by faui03.informatik.uni-erlangen.de (8.12.9/8.12.9) id h5REs18J028184 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:54:01 +0200 (CEST) Date: Fri, 27 Jun 2003 16:54:01 +0200 From: Thomas Glanzmann Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] MMU Message-ID: <20030627145401.GE24470@stud.uni-erlangen.de> References: <20030627130019.GB22176@stud.uni-erlangen.de> <20030627160323.63a45673.jrydberg@night.trouble.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20030627160323.63a45673.jrydberg@night.trouble.net> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Help: List-Post: List-Subscribe: , List-Archive: List-Unsubscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > I can not really speak for Fabrice, but with a software MMU there would > be no need for any modifications to the Linux kernel. You would expect > a slowdown between ~1.2 and ~3 (estimated values), though. That sound really good. Next step could be to let windows run. :-) Greetings, Thomas