From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Aj0qr-0000ox-DP
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:43:49 -0500
Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24)
	id 1Aj0pv-0000Xv-6B
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:43:22 -0500
Received: from [199.232.41.8] (helo=mx20.gnu.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.24) id 1Aj0Q2-0001Uq-HF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:16:06 -0500
Received: from [130.136.10.114] (helo=pob.cs.unibo.it)
	by mx20.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1Aj0D8-00077b-DE
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 20 Jan 2004 13:02:46 -0500
Date: Tue, 20 Jan 2004 19:02:44 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] QEMU 0.5.2 testing
Message-ID: <20040120180244.GG25680@cs.unibo.it>
References: <400B1217.8000202@free.fr> <20040120170915.GE25680@cs.unibo.it>
	<20040120172624.GA32060@suse.de>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040120172624.GA32060@suse.de>
From: renzo@cs.unibo.it (Renzo Davoli)
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: <qemu-devel.nongnu.org>
List-Unsubscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://mail.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> Indeed. Overall the speed is _very_ impressive, though.
Please don't let me be misunderstood.

Mine are not "criticisms", Qemu is one step to "perfection".
I wanna give "constructive" hints and debugging advises.

I agree: the overall speed *is* impressive.

renzo