From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AmDX0-00017C-Tf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:52:34 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AmDWS-0000vv-6y for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:52:31 -0500 Received: from [130.136.10.114] (helo=pob.cs.unibo.it) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AmDWR-0000vZ-Ks for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 09:51:59 -0500 Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 15:51:57 +0100 Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Knoppix results Message-ID: <20040129145157.GA13960@cs.unibo.it> References: <200401282211.00224.kyle@silverbeach.net> <20040129141247.GA13654@cs.unibo.it> <20040129153217.55cfc212.jrydberg@night.trouble.net> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040129153217.55cfc212.jrydberg@night.trouble.net> From: renzo@cs.unibo.it (Renzo Davoli) Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: Johan Rydberg Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thu, Jan 29, 2004 at 03:32:17PM +0100, Johan Rydberg wrote: > How hard would it be to attach the processor to GDB? I suspect you would > make things a lot easier for Fabrice if you showed him at least a backtrace. > Or how about tracking down the bug yourself and send a patch? Everything's alright? The use of gdb and the writing of patches is as simple for me as for you. I have posted fixes here and elsewhere when I have had the opportunity to. Sorry to have touched your bugfix sensibility. renzo