From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AmRLV-0005c2-Pu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:37:37 -0500 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.24) id 1AmRKz-0005Hn-5H for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:37:36 -0500 Received: from [24.21.209.245] (helo=pdx.silverbeach.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.24) id 1AmRKy-0005Hh-RW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 30 Jan 2004 00:37:04 -0500 Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1]) by pdx.silverbeach.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 5F9931BF47C for ; Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:33:25 -0800 (PST) From: Kyle Hayes Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Knoppix results Date: Thu, 29 Jan 2004 21:33:24 -0800 References: <200401282211.00224.kyle@silverbeach.net> <200401290843.11725.kyle@silverbeach.net> <20040129183821.5547ad6f.jrydberg@night.trouble.net> In-Reply-To: <20040129183821.5547ad6f.jrydberg@night.trouble.net> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200401292133.24233.kyle@silverbeach.net> Reply-To: kyle@silverbeach.net, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thursday 29 January 2004 09:38, Johan Rydberg wrote: > Kyle Hayes wrote: > : Would I run QEMU from the command line via GDB? > : > : $ gdb qemu -hda hda.img -cdrom knoppix.iso -boot d -m 128 > : > : Oh, right, I can't pass it args... Ugh. > > If you have a recent version of GDB (I'm not sure GDB 5.3, which is > ancient, support this) you can use the --args argument. Odd, Gentoo uses 5.3. If I go to the unstable pool of packages, I can get 6.0. Normally Gentoo is quite up to date. Is there a stability problem with newer GDB versions? > $ gdb --args qemu -hda .... Cool. > : I find GDB to be one of the more difficult tools to use unless you use > : it every hour of every day. I do almost exclusively Perl coding and have > : for years now. > > Sure, it's a rather complex tool. But as soon as you get familiar with it, > you can not live without it. It doesn't help at all for Perl programming compared to the Perl debugger :-) Since I don't do much C code anymore, the utility of GDB is fairly low for me. > : That's odd. Any clues > : why that would happen? What does the shared library handler warning > : mean? > > No idea. I suggest you update GDB (to version 6 at least) and give that > a try. Yeah, I'll try that. Now off to find the syntax for updating a package from the unstable section... Best, Kyle