From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BE3LM-0006JL-EG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 05:39:36 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BE3Kl-00062P-KB for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 05:39:30 -0400 Received: from [62.4.22.179] (helo=mail.bbrox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BE3JW-0005b3-KL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Apr 2004 05:37:42 -0400 Date: Thu, 15 Apr 2004 11:37:38 +0200 From: Lionel Ulmer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Win2k mouse Message-ID: <20040415113738.B19597@bbland> References: <002801c42260$67c56110$0401a8c0@putte2k> <200404151052.55500.jm@poure.com> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <200404151052.55500.jm@poure.com>; from jm@poure.com on Thu, Apr 15, 2004 at 10:52:54AM +0200 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: jm@poure.com, qemu-devel@nongnu.org Cc: Mike Nordell > In the case of Win2k, appying the ne2000 patch and solving the mouse issue > would be perfect. Then people can start using Win2k and sending bug reports, > patches and improvements. In my case, I still have QEMU segfaulting on me during the second stage installation. Lionel -- Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/