From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from list by monty-python.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BLkRP-0002ug-8r for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 11:05:39 -0400 Received: from mail by monty-python.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.30) id 1BLkQn-0002i2-5q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 11:05:32 -0400 Received: from [64.253.108.95] (helo=talon.kainx.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.30) id 1BLkQm-0002gz-Eb for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 06 May 2004 11:05:00 -0400 Date: Thu, 6 May 2004 11:04:55 -0400 From: Michael Jennings Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Seg Faults from 0.5.4 Message-ID: <20040506150455.GA24214@kainx.org> References: <20040504183506.GP24214@kainx.org> <20040504204001.GS24214@kainx.org> <20040504224129.GC8145@MAIL.13thfloor.at> <20040505021320.GA15032@kainx.org> <20040506134822.GB31514@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040506134822.GB31514@MAIL.13thfloor.at> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Thursday, 06 May 2004, at 15:48:22 (+0200), Herbert Poetzl wrote: > not convinced that this is the reason, but I'd try with a 3.3 or 3.4 > gcc as 3.2.x had some issues with the optimization ... The optimization of the qemu code as it's compiled? I built using "-O2 -march=pentium" if that makes a difference...should I try -O0 or -O1 instead? Perhaps build for a different architecture? Unfortunately I don't have gcc 3.4 packaged quite yet, but I should within the next week or so. Thanks! Michael -- Michael Jennings (a.k.a. KainX) http://www.kainx.org/ n + 1, Inc., http://www.nplus1.net/ Author, Eterm (www.eterm.org) ----------------------------------------------------------------------- "IMPORTANT NOTICE: If you are one of the hundreds of parachuting enthusiasts who bought our 'Easy Sky Diving' book, please make the following correction: on page 8, line 7, the words 'state zip code' should have read 'pull rip cord.'" -- notice appearing in a Warrenton, Virginia, newspaper