* [Qemu-devel] Qemu+openMosix HOWTO
@ 2004-05-24 10:53 Mulyadi Santosa
2004-05-24 12:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gabriel Ebner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2004-05-24 10:53 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
[-- Attachment #1: Type: text/plain, Size: 323 bytes --]
hello all
This is my newest Dojo, as the subject mention, it is a HOWTO about setting up
virtual cluster using Qemu and openMosix
As this is 1.0 version, i might write something wrong or miss something that
you think need to include, so feel free to add corrections or critics.
happy exercising ur Chi !! :-)
regards
[-- Warning: decoded text below may be mangled, UTF-8 assumed --]
[-- Attachment #2: Qemu-openMosix.doc.txt --]
[-- Type: text/plain; charset="us-ascii"; name="Qemu-openMosix.doc.txt", Size: 19505 bytes --]
OpenMosix Dojo (version 1.0. Copyright of Mulyadi Santosa)
Qemu and OpenMosix: The Internal Power of Virtualization
Trying the first adventure into clustering arena? Then maybe you
began to gather some old PC from your garage, borrowing PCs from your
friend, or even sneaking into your neighbour's home trying to
"pick"their PC? :-) All just because “oh boy, i just have one
PC.........and I want to play with openMosix for a while, but I have
no more PC...”.
Or maybe, you are a brave spirit try to “conquer” openMosix, so you
install openMosix on 4 PCs and then "booommmm" you got nasty
segfaults. and then someone suggests you to download and try new
version of openMosix patch....now it's time for another leg and hand
sport, moving around between PCs to update the kernel. Well, LTSP
might helps, but maybe it's not a good idea.
So, it's time to gather your strength. If you know Chi practice on
kungfu, now we do the same for your lonely PC....:-) If you ever heard
tools like VMWare, Bochs, Xen, Plex86, User Mode Linux or the gangs,
then it is time to meet
Qemu(http://http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/) Grab the source
tarball at http://fabrice.bellard.free.fr/qemu/qemu-0.5.5.tar.gz, this
is the latest version (0.5.5)
Unpack the tarball (using tar -xzvf). Now, before you do the actual
"make", apply the following patch
---------------------CUT Start of the Patch-----------------------
--- ./before-diff/sdl.c 2004-05-18 10:33:05.000000000 +0700
+++ ./sdl.c 2004-05-18 10:40:55.000000000 +0700
@@ -130,6 +130,7 @@
static void sdl_process_key(SDL_KeyboardEvent *ev)
{
int keycode, v;
+ static int modif;
/* XXX: not portable, but avoids complicated mappings */
keycode = ev->keysym.scancode;
@@ -150,6 +151,78 @@
} else {
keycode = 0;
}
+ /* Adjust shift-key states when leaving window */
+
+ if (ev->keysym.scancode == 0) {
+ if ((modif ^ ev->keysym.mod) & KMOD_LSHIFT)
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x2a | (modif & KMOD_LSHIFT ? 0x80 : 0));
+ if ((modif ^ ev->keysym.mod) & KMOD_RSHIFT)
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x36 | (modif & KMOD_RSHIFT ? 0x80 : 0));
+ if ((modif ^ ev->keysym.mod) & KMOD_LCTRL)
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x1d | (modif & KMOD_LCTRL ? 0x80 : 0));
+ if ((modif ^ ev->keysym.mod) & KMOD_RCTRL) {
+ kbd_put_keycode(0xe0 );
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x1d | (modif & KMOD_RCTRL ? 0x80 : 0));
+ }
+ if ((modif ^ ev->keysym.mod) & KMOD_LALT)
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x38 | (modif & KMOD_LALT ? 0x80 : 0));
+ if ((modif ^ ev->keysym.mod) & KMOD_RALT) {
+ kbd_put_keycode(0xe0 );
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x38 | (modif & KMOD_RALT ? 0x80 : 0));
+ }
+ modif = ev->keysym.mod;
+ }
+
+ /* remember shift-key state */
+
+ switch (keycode) {
+ case 0x2a: /* Left Shift */
+ if (ev->type == SDL_KEYUP)
+ modif &= ~KMOD_LSHIFT;
+ else
+ modif |= KMOD_LSHIFT;
+ break;
+ case 0x36: /* Right Shift */
+ if (ev->type == SDL_KEYUP)
+ modif &= ~KMOD_RSHIFT;
+ else
+ modif |= KMOD_RSHIFT;
+ break;
+ case 0x1d: /* Left CTRL */
+ if (ev->type == SDL_KEYUP)
+ modif &= ~KMOD_LCTRL;
+ else
+ modif |= KMOD_LCTRL;
+ break;
+ case 0x1de0: /* Right CTRL */
+ if (ev->type == SDL_KEYUP)
+ modif &= ~KMOD_RCTRL;
+ else
+ modif |= KMOD_RCTRL;
+ break;
+ case 0x38: /* Left ALT */
+ if (ev->type == SDL_KEYUP)
+ modif &= ~KMOD_LALT;
+ else
+ modif |= KMOD_LALT;
+ break;
+ case 0x38e0: /* Right ALT */
+ if (ev->type == SDL_KEYUP)
+ modif &= ~KMOD_RALT;
+ else
+ modif |= KMOD_RALT;
+ break;
+ case 0x45: /* Num Lock */
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x45);
+ kbd_put_keycode(0xc5);
+ return;
+ case 0x3a: /* Caps Lock */
+ kbd_put_keycode(0x3a);
+ kbd_put_keycode(0xba);
+ return;
+
+ }
+
/* now send the key code */
while (keycode != 0) {
---------------CUT End of Patch------------------------------
basically this is a patch for fixing a keyboard problem in the SDL
Graphic output. This patch is adjusted for SDL-1.2.5-3 on Redhat 9, so
feel free to adjust the patch for your distro/setting. Do I mention
SDL? yes, you need to install SDL and SDL devel package if you want
graphical output (it is heavily recommended....at least from my point
of view)
Now, do the usual mantra. I assume that you will
install into /usr/local/qemu:
# ./configure --prefix=/usr/local/qemu/
# make && make install
Now, we are ready to build the disk image. You can imagine disk image
as virtual hard drive for Qemu. I assume you want to create the disk
image inside /mnt/qemu:
dd of=/mnt/qemu/myimage bs=1M seek=700 count=0
The above command is example on creating 700 MB of empty image. You
can set another size by changing "seek" and "bs" parameter. "man dd"
for complete reference
export this directory on QEMU_TMPDIR environment variable:
export QEMU_TMPDIR=/mytmpfs
after that, pick you Linux CD or ISO image and run the following
command (from now on, please self adjust the actual path to qemu and
qemu-fast binary):
# qemu -hda /mnt/qemu/myimage -cdrom /mnt/cdrom -boot boot d -mem 64
This is relatively easy to understand, it tolds qemu to boot from CD
Rom and also load the disk image so you can start the instalation.
Couple weeks ago, I install debian 3.0 woody inside the disk image
because i think it is relatively stable and compact. You can pick
another distro of you flavour...just remember to give enough room
because so far I don't know how to resize the disk image :-)
Just install Linux as usual and don't forget to set swap partition.
So, actually when you finish installing Linux, inside the disk image,
it should contains the root partition and the swap.
The things you need to include are gcc/glibc, shells (of course, who
can live without it ;-) ), automake/autoconf, tar, gzip/gunzip.
After finishing the Linux instalation, quit first from Qemu and now we
move to openMosix kernel compilation. Put the below patch on your
openMosix patched kernel to make it compatible with qemu-fast:
----------------CUT Start of patch------------------------
diff -Naur ./linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds
./linux-qemu/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds--- ./linux/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds
2002-02-26 02:37:53.000000000 +0700+++
./linux-qemu/arch/i386/vmlinux.lds 2004-05-17 17:15:37.000000000
+0700@@ -6,7 +6,7 @@ ENTRY(_start)
SECTIONS
{
- . = 0xC0000000 + 0x100000;
+ . = 0x90000000 + 0x100000;
_text = .; /* Text and read-only data */
.text : {
*(.text)
diff -Naur ./linux/include/asm-i386/page.h
./linux-qemu/include/asm-i386/page.h---
./linux/include/asm-i386/page.h 2004-05-14 12:26:48.000000000 +0700+++
./linux-qemu/include/asm-i386/page.h 2004-05-17 17:14:50.000000000
+0700@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ * and CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G options in the kernel
configuration. */
-#define __PAGE_OFFSET (0xC0000000)
+#define __PAGE_OFFSET (0x90000000)
/*
* This much address space is reserved for vmalloc() and iomap()
--------------------------CUT end of patch---------------------------
This patch is modifying several kernel page offset, so it becomes
compatible with qemu-fast.....
Why do we need qemu-fast? Why not using plain Qemu? The answer is:
(copied from Qemu documentation)
"qemu-fast uses the host Memory Management Unit (MMU) to simulate the
x86 MMU. It is fast but has limitations because the whole 4 GB address
space cannot be used and some memory mapped peripherials cannot be
emulated accurately yet"
In other word, qemu-fast doesn't simulate MMU, instead it use the
host's MMU.....should be faster right? But yes, there is 4GB
limitation, but who want 4GB just for simulation? :-) It should be
fine for general case AFAIK
On kernel configuration, remember to add kernel native (not module)
for ne2k and ne2000: ( you can found them on "Network device
support"-->"Etherne 10 or 100 MBit")
CONFIG_NE2000=y
CONFIG_NE2K_PCI=y
I am not sure which one actually needed for Qemu, but adding both
won't hurt :-) Feed another option if you think you will need them
Do the usual kernel compilation, and move the finished bzImage (i
prefer bzImage, it is up to you the pick the final type of kernel),
vmlinux and System.map to a directory. if you had modules, we will
move them later inside the disk image. Lets assume you move them to
/boot/qemu Oh, BTW, it is also a good idea to put tmpfs mounted
directory for Qemu's need. here I create 1 Gigabyte tmpfs:
mount -t tmpfs -o size=1G tmpfs /mytmpfs/
Now, we need to testdrive the kernel. Put following command as shell
script :
/usr/local/qemu/bin/qemu-fast -hda /mnt/qemu/myimage -hdb /dev/hda
-kernel /boot/qemu/bzImage -append "root=/dev/hda1
ide3=noprobe ide4=noprobe ide5=noprobe"
The above script assume that you create root filesystem inside the
disk image on first partition, that's why the root parameter is
"/dev/hda1". And what is "-hdb /dev/hda"? Well, we need to copy
several files from host system, so we need to mount the disk inside
the Qemu :-) If your layout is different, again feel free to modify
the parameter
You get the login prompt? Congratulations ! Now, login and make sure
you have following report from "dmesg":
NE*000 ethercard probe at 0x300: 52 54 00 12 34 56
eth0: NE2000 found at 0x300, using IRQ 9.
This lines indicate that kernel succesfully detect emulated NE2000
card. So far I have no problem with the "fake" NE2000, so the only
trick is....just make sure you are including NE2000 support.
We have moved half-way so far. Now we move the kernel modules....how?
by mounting fake "/dev/hdb" inside Qemu. e.g:
mount -t ext2 /dev/hdb1 /mnt/host
There....you can access the host filesystem, now copy the /lib/modules
straight into the disk image. After that, "halt" the guest system and
restart qemu using above script. You should find out that now "the
missing modules" are loaded successfuly
openMosix need user land tools, right? Same like above, transfer the
userland tools tarball (use version 0.3.5) inside the guest and do
compilation. This way, we make sure that it is compiled against
correct gcc/glibc.Oh wait? you need oM kernel headers? Mount the host
filesystem and create the soft link from openMosix kernel source
toward /usr/src/linux-openmosix and then the compilation will goes
smooth
I will skip the oM spesific setting, just refer to the HOWTO for how
to setup /etc/inittab, setting maps etc. Also remember to setup ip
address for eth0 (on Debian, you can turn it on after start up using
/etc/networks/interface)
Again, shut down the guest system. Now we move to setting up the
second node. "What, doing above steps again? You gotta be
kidding, right? I need faster way" ! Ok, relax :-) that's why we will
create COW (Copy on Write Image). What is it? You can imagine as a way
for sharing original disk image between Qemu instances, but each
instance keeping its own copy of disk image if they do some
modifications inside the original disk image. The original image will
be safe.....
Lets create two COWs (yes COW, but not cows which produces milk, ok?
:-))) ):
# qemu-mkcow -f /mnt/qemu/myimage /mnt/qemu/mycow1.cow
# qemu-mkcow -f /mnt/qemu/myimage /mnt/qemu/mycow2.cow
Not so difficult, right? After that, create script for enabling the
TUN/TAP device. "Wait wait....TUN/TAP, why do I need it?" Well,
TUN/TAP is virtual device that acting as network bridge between
guest system and its host. So, if you don't turn it on, there is
no "network connection" between guest and its host
here is the example of the script:
#!/bin/sh
sudo /sbin/ifconfig $1 192.168.1.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
Modify above script for each TUN/TAP of the guests and remember not to
assign same IP to other TUN/TAP or guest's IP
I suggest to separate the netmask of TUN/TAP device and the interface
inside the guest against the netmask of host. I use this trick so I
won't mess a lot with host's routing table. For this "Dojo" i use
following topology:
host (10.1.1.1)
/ \
/ \
/ \
1st TUN/TAP (192.168.1.11) 2nd TUN/TAP (192.168.1.12)
| |
| |
1st guest (192.168.1.21) 2nd guest (192.168.1.22)
Got brighter picture from above diagram? I hope so.....:-) So, back to
the TUN script, you should write two script:
For 1st TUN/TAP: (name it /mnt/qemu/qemu-ifup)
#!/bin/sh
sudo /sbin/ifconfig $1 192.168.1.11 netmask 255.255.255.0
For 2nd TUN/TAP: (name it /mnt/qemu/qemu-ifup2)
#!/bin/sh
sudo /sbin/ifconfig $1 192.168.1.12 netmask 255.255.255.0
eth0 inside 1st guest: 192.168.21
eth0 inside 2nd guest: 192.168.22
I use above IP numbering so I can quickly remind myself about the
topology (x.x.x.x1 is for 1st group, x.x.x.x2 for 2nd group). You
don't have to follow my idea :-)
because you already have two COWs, modify the qemu start script, so it
becomes:
(for 1st guest)
/usr/local/qemu/bin/qemu-fast -hda /mnt/qemu/mycow1.cow -macaddr
52:54:00:12:34:56 -kernel /boot/qemu/bzImage -n ./qemu-ifup
-append "root=/dev/hda1 ide3=noprobe ide4=noprobe ide5=noprobe"
(for 2nd guest)
/usr/local/qemu/bin/qemu-fast -hda /mnt/qemu/mycow2.cow -macaddr
52:54:00:12:34:60 -kernel /boot/qemu/bzImage -n ./qemu-ifup2
-append "root=/dev/hda1 ide3=noprobe ide4=noprobe ide5=noprobe"
"I am noticing -macaddr switch...Why do we need it?" The answer: if
you don't set it explicitly, you will get same mac address for the
both guest system...and that would confuse TCP/IP arp resolve
mechanism. So, we need to set distinct MAC adress for each of
guests. Still confuse on what I am talking about? Go to RFC about ARP
or TCP/IP and read about IP to MAC Adress resolution mechanism.
Now, fire up both qemu instance and watch them load the openMosix
kernel until you got login prompt. back to host system, now we need to
setup a bridge connecting these 2 guests "Oh boy, another pain is
come....when it will stop? " :))) remember, dojo is the place to
practice, not for instant skill like Neo when he got kung fu skill
inside Matrix :-) The quote "No pain no gain" must be followed here
:_)))
OK, back to bridge. You can imagine bridge as "a hub connecting
any target network interface" Copy following script to setup bridge
between TUN0 and TUN1:
(let's name is start-bridge.sh)
#!/bin/bash
/sbin/modprobe bridge
/sbin/route del -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
/sbin/route del -net 192.168.1.0 netmask 255.255.255.0
/usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0
/usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 tun0
/usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 tun1
/sbin/ifconfig br0 192.168.1.13 netmask 255.255.255.0
/sbin/ifconfig tun0 0.0.0.0
/sbin/ifconfig tun1 0.0.0.0
Basically, the default kernel on redhat 9 (the one I use as
experiment) comes with bridging capability as module (bridge.o) If you
don't found one, recompile the kernel and make sure you include this:
CONFIG_BRIDGE=m (as module)--> preferred
or
CONFIG_BRIDGE=y (as native kernel part)
You can find them under "Networking options". It is named "802.1d
Ethernet Bridging".
Why do we need to do "route del"? Well, remember that we previously
turn up the TUN/TAP device? On Linux (recently), "ifconfig"
automatically setup routing for each new IP address assigned to a
device. So, basically we clean them up becaue we don't need them!
The next line is about setting up the bridge itself. You need to
install bridge-utils RPM (RH 9 includes this tools). If you don't
think your distro doesn't include it, go to
http://www.math.leidenuniv.nl/~buytenh/bridge and grab the tarball
there. Actually, what I am goinf to explain is short version of Bridge
Mini Howto, you can find more about bridging on www.tldp.org and
search about "bridge". usually many distribution includes this docs.
Lets analyze the command
/usr/sbin/brctl addbr br0
--> here we create new bridge interface named "br0"
/usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 tun0
/usr/sbin/brctl addif br0 tun1
--> here we "bond" the tun0 and tun1 so they were attached "inside"
the bridge
/sbin/ifconfig br0 192.168.1.13 netmask 255.255.255.0
--> like you know, assign an IP address and netmask for the bridge.
You still need to assure that the bridge on same subnet like the
guests are.....
/sbin/ifconfig tun0 0.0.0.0
/sbin/ifconfig tun1 0.0.0.0
--> easy, just assign 0.0.0.0 IP (but not turn down, i repeat DO NOT
turn the TUNs down) for the TUNs :-)
The topology becomes
host (10.1.1.1/24)
/ \
/ \
/ \
T H E B R I D G E (192.168.1.13/24)
| |
| |
1st TUN/TAP (0.0.0.0) 2nd TUN/TAP (0.0.0.0)
| |
| |
1st guest (192.168.1.21/24) 2nd guest (192.168.1.22/24)
Now try to ping from guest 1 to guest 2 and likewise.....success? Now
start the openMosix (just copy the openMosix start/stop script from
openMosix userland tarball) and confirm that "mosmon" see all the
nodes !
Let me state something before we goes further. Something inside Qemu
screw up openMosix auto detection of system's speed, so make sure you
include this line on your openMosix startup script
mosctl setspeed 15000
feel free to adjust the number, but make sure you set same number
across all guest system, if not, you will got weird load levelling
mechanism...believe me....:-) It takes 2 days for me just to find out
about this "speed" thing when I saw openMosix doesn't load
balance my program :-)))
After that, try the migration between guests.....this won't be an
openMosix cluster if it can't migrate process, right? :-) Just compile
simple C program like below:void main()
{
int a=0,b=0;
for (a=0;a<=1000000;a++)
for (b=0;b<=1000000;b++)
{
};
}
suppose you name it "silly.c" then compile it as "silly" and run silly
in the background (add "&"). 2 instance of "silly" is sufficient for
start..
Success? Then congratulations...you have exercised your Chi into
highest level :-) have fun with your new virtual Cluster
reference:
- Qemu user documentation and technical documentation
- openMosix HOWTO
- Ethernet Bridge mini HOWTO
- Documentation/networking/tmpfs.txt inside the kernel source
directory
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu+openMosix HOWTO
2004-05-24 10:53 [Qemu-devel] Qemu+openMosix HOWTO Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2004-05-24 12:47 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-05-25 3:03 ` Mulyadi Santosa
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Ebner @ 2004-05-24 12:47 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hello,
Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> diff -Naur ./linux/include/asm-i386/page.h
> ./linux-qemu/include/asm-i386/page.h---
> ./linux/include/asm-i386/page.h 2004-05-14 12:26:48.000000000
> +0700+++ ./linux-qemu/include/asm-i386/page.h 2004-05-17
> 17:14:50.000000000 +0700@@ -78,7 +78,7 @@ * and CONFIG_HIGHMEM64G options
> in the kernel configuration. */
>
> -#define __PAGE_OFFSET (0xC0000000)
> +#define __PAGE_OFFSET (0x90000000)
Is that still necessary? From what I recall, qemu-fast can now run
unmodified operating systems as Fabrice wrote:
> 2) qemu-fast is being enhanced to run unpatched OSes and to support VESA
> VBE graphics.
>
> The limitations of qemu-fast are that if data at addresses >= 0xc0000000
> is used, then soft MMU is used in the corresponding translated block.
>
> Moreover, the guest user code has write access to the guest OS code and
> also to the host QEMU code. It means that qemu-fast is not safe. I don't
> know yet what is the best way to solve this issue.
Gabriel.
--
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "ta.renbeleirbag@eg"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Qemu+openMosix HOWTO
2004-05-24 12:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gabriel Ebner
@ 2004-05-25 3:03 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2004-05-25 10:08 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: " Gabriel Ebner
0 siblings, 1 reply; 6+ messages in thread
From: Mulyadi Santosa @ 2004-05-25 3:03 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel; +Cc: Gabriel Ebner
hello Gabriel
> > -#define __PAGE_OFFSET (0xC0000000)
> > +#define __PAGE_OFFSET (0x90000000)
>
> Is that still necessary? From what I recall, qemu-fast can now run
>
> unmodified operating systems as Fabrice wrote:
AFAIK from my experience loading openMosix patched kernel with qemu-fast, if I
don't patch the kernel like I did above, the kernel will hang somewhere after
probing the network card or IDE probing (to the main disk image)
I test this using Qemu 0.5.5 (not CVS snapshot) and openMosix 2.4.22-3 +
kernel 2.4.22 (Non SMP and non HIGHMEM support)
But, anyway, if qemu-fast has been improved in such way so I don't need to
patch again, it will be more user-friendly IMO :-)
regards
Mulyadi
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Re: Qemu+openMosix HOWTO
2004-05-25 3:03 ` Mulyadi Santosa
@ 2004-05-25 10:08 ` Gabriel Ebner
2004-05-25 12:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-05-25 15:40 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
0 siblings, 2 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Gabriel Ebner @ 2004-05-25 10:08 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hello,
Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> I test this using Qemu 0.5.5 (not CVS snapshot) and openMosix 2.4.22-3 +
> kernel 2.4.22 (Non SMP and non HIGHMEM support)
>
> But, anyway, if qemu-fast has been improved in such way so I don't need to
> patch again, it will be more user-friendly IMO :-)
Actually that work should have been done 3 months before the release
according to the post. I can't test it here because I'm running gentoo,
and last time I checked, qemu-fast wouldn't compile due to some linking
error.
Gabriel.
--
Gabriel Ebner - reverse "ta.renbeleirbag@eg"
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Re: Qemu+openMosix HOWTO
2004-05-25 10:08 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: " Gabriel Ebner
@ 2004-05-25 12:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-05-25 15:40 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Herbert Poetzl @ 2004-05-25 12:19 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: Gabriel Ebner; +Cc: qemu-devel
On Tue, May 25, 2004 at 12:08:15PM +0200, Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> Hello,
>
> Mulyadi Santosa wrote:
> > I test this using Qemu 0.5.5 (not CVS snapshot) and openMosix 2.4.22-3 +
> > kernel 2.4.22 (Non SMP and non HIGHMEM support)
> >
> > But, anyway, if qemu-fast has been improved in such way so I don't need to
> > patch again, it will be more user-friendly IMO :-)
>
> Actually that work should have been done 3 months before the release
> according to the post. I can't test it here because I'm running gentoo,
> and last time I checked, qemu-fast wouldn't compile due to some linking
> error.
AFAIK the ide emulation has big problems when
using qemu-fast with an unpatched kernel
(reported this twice ...)
best,
Herbert
PS: this is still valid for 0.5.5 (haven't tried
with CVS yet)
>
> Gabriel.
>
> --
> Gabriel Ebner - reverse "ta.renbeleirbag@eg"
>
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://mail.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
* Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Re: Qemu+openMosix HOWTO
2004-05-25 10:08 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: " Gabriel Ebner
2004-05-25 12:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
@ 2004-05-25 15:40 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
1 sibling, 0 replies; 6+ messages in thread
From: Alexander E. Patrakov @ 2004-05-25 15:40 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Gabriel Ebner wrote:
> according to the post. I can't test it here because I'm running gentoo,
> and last time I checked, qemu-fast wouldn't compile due to some linking
> error.
See my post with the subject "qemu and modern glibc". After doing these
steps, you will get the qemu-fast binary, but it won't work. It never
worked for me on LFS 4.1 and on current LFS CVS b6_0.
--
Alexander E. Patrakov
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] 6+ messages in thread
end of thread, other threads:[~2004-05-25 16:03 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: 6+ messages (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-05-24 10:53 [Qemu-devel] Qemu+openMosix HOWTO Mulyadi Santosa
2004-05-24 12:47 ` [Qemu-devel] " Gabriel Ebner
2004-05-25 3:03 ` Mulyadi Santosa
2004-05-25 10:08 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: " Gabriel Ebner
2004-05-25 12:19 ` Herbert Poetzl
2004-05-25 15:40 ` Alexander E. Patrakov
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).