From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BTtqi-0001mo-CZ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 22:45:28 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BTtqf-0001lg-VX for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 22:45:27 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BTtqf-0001lP-Kk for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Fri, 28 May 2004 22:45:25 -0400 Received: from [194.90.9.20] (helo=mxout1.netvision.net.il) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BTEWH-0001mi-VW for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 02:37:38 -0400 Received: from abu-fatma.softier.local ([212.143.109.38]) by mxout1.netvision.net.il (iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep 8 2003)) with ESMTP id <0HYD0020T12PRK@mxout1.netvision.net.il> for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 27 May 2004 09:37:37 +0300 (IDT) Date: Thu, 27 May 2004 09:37:37 +0300 From: Hetz Ben Hamo Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] slow qemu-fast In-reply-to: <40B4D64D.9050500@interaktif.gen.tr> Message-id: <200405270937.37089.hetz@softier.com> MIME-version: 1.0 Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1255 Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT Content-disposition: inline References: <40B4D64D.9050500@interaktif.gen.tr> Reply-To: qemu-devel@gnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-ID: On Wednesday 26 May 2004 20:39, Emre Ersin wrote: > Hi, > I have strange problem that qemu runs faster than qemu-fast! Is there an > explanation for this? > And one more question; > which compiler optimization and linking method should I use to have more > speed? > Emre I think it's a timing bug. I was just installing Windows 98 as a guest and I've seen the clock running like mad ;) Thanks, Hetz