From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BWvPr-0005yk-Hn
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 07:02:15 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BWvPp-0005y9-7Y
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 07:02:14 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BWvPp-0005xz-4V
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 07:02:13 -0400
Received: from [192.167.206.30] (helo=reed.sns.it)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BWvPB-0006aO-8c
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 07:01:33 -0400
Received: from [192.167.206.31] (helo=sns.it)
	by reed.sns.it with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1 (Debian)) id 1BWvPx-0005FT-00
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Sun, 06 Jun 2004 13:02:21 +0200
Received: from [192.168.8.246] (account m.monge [192.168.8.246] verified)
	by sns.it (CommuniGate Pro SMTP 4.1.8)
	with ESMTP-TLS id 15743013 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org;
	Sun, 06 Jun 2004 13:02:32 +0200
From: Maurizio Monge <monge@sns.it>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] winXP on qemu-fast targeted
Date: Sun, 6 Jun 2004 13:00:34 +0200
References: <200406060828.37525.vaise@votreservice.com>
In-Reply-To: <200406060828.37525.vaise@votreservice.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200406061300.34740.monge@sns.it>
Reply-To: monge@sns.it, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Alle Sunday 06 June 2004 09:28, vaise@votreservice.com ha scritto:
> just an idea :
> We could launch two identical Windows 2000/XP img files with "qemu" and
> "qemu-fast", then compare and see where  there is a difference. Qemu could
> be patched so that it would be done automatically : launch the 2 instances,
> compare and stop if there is something wrong.
> There must be a limited number of cases (10 ? 100 ?).
> Then, for each different cases, Windows will have to be patched.
> Do the operation again until there is no crash.
>

As we are having problem running on amd64, and as amd64
supports bot 32bits ans 64bits code, we maybe could run
a qemu32 and qemu64 syncronize and check when something goes
wrong :-)

Maurizio