From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BXfcS-0003sP-GQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:22:20 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BXfcQ-0003ru-7K
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:22:19 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BXfcQ-0003rr-4x
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:22:18 -0400
Received: from [144.254.224.140] (helo=ams-iport-1.cisco.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BXfbg-0003ZE-71
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 08 Jun 2004 08:21:32 -0400
Received: from cisco.com (edinburgh.cisco.com [144.254.112.76])
	by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i58CEJ1P012203
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 14:14:20 +0200 (MEST)
Received: (from dfawcus@localhost)
	by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) id NAA13996
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:14:19 +0100 (BST)
Date: Tue, 8 Jun 2004 13:14:19 +0100
From: Derek Fawcus <dfawcus@cisco.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: NE2K PCI and Windows 98SE & Cirrus Logic
Message-ID: <20040608131418.N1510@edinburgh.cisco.com>
References: <001801c44d31$2b1291b0$0401a8c0@putte2k>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
In-Reply-To: <001801c44d31$2b1291b0$0401a8c0@putte2k>;
	from tamlin@algonet.se on Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:18:22AM +0200
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Jun 08, 2004 at 10:18:22AM +0200, Mike Nordell wrote:
> I'm still curious why 32MB is claimed in the pci_register_io_region call,
> even that it only has got 4MB.

Because that what's the hardware does - actually,  from memory I thought
this family only claimed 16M.

The reason for the larger size is given in the datasheet - it's multiple
mapped copies of the RAM so as top have automatic byteswapping.  So something
to beware of if this device is used under the PPC emulation.

DF