From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZBCk-0002Ve-6E for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:18:02 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BZBCi-0002VH-Go for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:18:01 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BZBCi-0002VE-Ej for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:18:00 -0400 Received: from [206.72.67.39] (helo=claudius.sentinelchicken.org) by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BZBBS-0004Dn-S9 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 12 Jun 2004 12:16:43 -0400 Date: Sat, 12 Jun 2004 09:16:38 -0700 From: Tim Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Windows 95 and qemu Message-ID: <20040612161637.GA1675@sentinelchicken.org> References: <1086949408.2728.42.camel@screamy> <40C98AE8.7020309@mech.kuleuven.ac.be> <40CAE720.8080306@bellard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <40CAE720.8080306@bellard.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org > The problem may be related to the fact that QEMU does not initialize the > HDD geometry fields in the CMOS memory. Could that also have something to do with the failures I have installing SP4 on Win2k? It seems odd that something that high-level would be checking something that low-level directly, but it does fail while "checking for disk space"... I don't know, just wild speculation... tim