From: Tim <tim-qemu@sentinelchicken.org>
To: "Vladimir N. Oleynik" <dzo@simtreas.ru>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] security_20040618
Date: Sat, 19 Jun 2004 08:05:15 -0700 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040619150514.GB1962@sentinelchicken.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <40D3ED57.2040506@simtreas.ru>
> > --- qemu-current/monitor.c 2004-06-16 20:49:59.000000000 -0700
> > +++ qemu-dev/monitor.c 2004-06-17 22:12:49.000000000 -0700
> > str = qemu_malloc(strlen(buf) + 1);
> > - strcpy(str, buf);
> > + pstrcpy(str, strlen(buf) + 1, buf);
>
> In my opinion, it already absolutely unnecessary correction.
> There is in this place no problem.
Yeah, you are probably right. I looked at that one on 3 seperate
occasions before making the change, since I recognized that there are
very few conditions where it could possibly be a problem, and come to
think of it, this fix doesn't mitigate those conditions.
That chunk of code makes me uncomfortable for other reasons though (does
qemu_malloc() return NULL ever? could buf possibly be missing a
trailing '\0' ever?) so I'll re-visit it again and see what makes the
most sense. The pstrcpy isn't hurting anything though. Slightly slower
copy, due to the length checking, but it isn't in a critical piece of
code (monitor.c is just for the user interface command prompt, right?),
so I also don't see a reason to remove it, esp if changes in the future
open up the possibility of an overflow.
thanks for the comment,
tim
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-06-19 15:06 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 23+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
[not found] <200406181841.i5IIfZQa019337@treas.simtreas.ru>
2004-06-19 7:33 ` [Qemu-devel] Errors compiling QEMU with Mingw Vladimir N. Oleynik
2004-06-19 7:37 ` [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] security_20040618 Vladimir N. Oleynik
2004-06-19 15:05 ` Tim [this message]
2004-06-20 18:22 ` [Qemu-devel] " Charlie Gordon
2004-06-20 19:26 ` Tim
2004-06-20 20:10 ` [Qemu-devel] " Charlie Gordon
2004-06-20 21:57 ` Tim
2004-06-21 8:50 ` OT: C Q/As, was Re: [Qemu-devel] security_20040618 Christof Petig
2004-06-21 10:21 ` [Qemu-devel] OT: C Q/As, was security_20040618 Charlie Gordon
2004-06-21 10:41 ` Christof Petig
2004-06-21 15:44 ` OT: C Q/As, was Re: [Qemu-devel] security_20040618 Michael Jennings
2004-06-22 9:57 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: completely OT: C Q/As, was security_20040618 Charlie Gordon
2004-06-22 10:49 ` Sander Nagtegaal
2004-06-22 12:37 ` [Qemu-devel] " Charlie Gordon
2004-06-22 15:38 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: completely OT: C Q/As Michael Jennings
2004-06-24 14:21 ` [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: completely OT: C Q/As : let's feed the troll Charlie Gordon
2004-06-18 18:40 [Qemu-devel] [PATCH] security_20040618 Tim
2004-06-19 9:11 ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-06-19 15:19 ` Tim
2004-06-19 15:26 ` Gianni Tedesco
2004-06-19 15:44 ` Fabrice Bellard
2004-06-19 16:01 ` Tim
2004-06-19 17:11 ` Fabrice Bellard
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040619150514.GB1962@sentinelchicken.org \
--to=tim-qemu@sentinelchicken.org \
--cc=dzo@simtreas.ru \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).