From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BeTkn-0005hX-KR
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:07:05 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BeTkm-0005hL-62
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:07:05 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BeTkm-0005hI-3P
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:07:04 -0400
Received: from [130.136.10.114] (helo=pob.cs.unibo.it)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BeTig-0001fL-QG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 27 Jun 2004 03:04:55 -0400
Date: Sun, 27 Jun 2004 09:04:53 +0200
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] replies
Message-ID: <20040627070453.GA15311@cs.unibo.it>
References: <20040626184535.GA19123@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<200406271007.11404.a_mulyadi@telkom.net>
	<20040627050111.GA24787@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<20040627052132.GA14931@cs.unibo.it>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040627052132.GA14931@cs.unibo.it>
From: renzo@cs.unibo.it (Renzo Davoli)
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> Tap would be the more appropriate as entire packets with data-link header 
> are exchanged.
I mean, tun or tap are just names, the interfaces within vde or qemu
(AFAIK) are opened as "IFF_TAP" so they are tap even when named tun.

renzo