From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BjGY2-0000xc-1c for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:01:42 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BjGXy-0000wc-Qc for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:01:40 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BjGXx-0000wH-SV for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 08:01:38 -0400 Received: from [62.253.162.45] (helo=mta05-svc.ntlworld.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BjGVS-0001tO-Iu for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 07:59:02 -0400 Received: from nemesis.frop.org ([62.253.132.150]) by mta05-svc.ntlworld.com (InterMail vM.4.01.03.37 201-229-121-137-20020806) with ESMTP id <20040710115659.DRMC2927.mta05-svc.ntlworld.com@nemesis.frop.org> for ; Sat, 10 Jul 2004 12:56:59 +0100 From: Julian Seward Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: openbsd image on freeoszoo Date: Sat, 10 Jul 2004 13:00:25 +0100 References: <20040709231808.GA17856@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> <20040710012734.GA19388@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> In-Reply-To: <20040710012734.GA19388@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="utf-8" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200407101300.25062.jseward@acm.org> Reply-To: jseward@acm.org, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Saturday 10 July 2004 02:27, Jim C. Brown wrote: > On Fri, Jul 09, 2004 at 07:18:08PM -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote: > > I also get lots of "remote transmit DMA failed to complete" errors, for > > both the ISA and the PCI nic. I haven't solved this one yet but it seems > > harmless. (For the ISA nic, it seems that it MUST be called ne2 btw or > > network won't work.) For the PCI nic, I also get "send_packet: > > Input/output error", not solved yet either. > > Fixed in qemu. Attached is the patch that fixes it. This looks like a bug > in qemu, as it transfers an odd number of bytes in words, leaving a count > of -1 when done. But if so, it has never been caught before... Are you sure this is really right (or is the right solution to the problem) ? I had networking working in WinXP fine. When I installed the patch, it stopped working. Backing out the patch caused it to start working again. Any ideas? J