From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bl36g-0000yN-3o
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 06:04:50 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bl36e-0000xz-J7
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 06:04:49 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bl36e-0000xp-Bt
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 06:04:48 -0400
Received: from [194.90.9.20] (helo=mxout1.netvision.net.il)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bl33r-0003Jk-8l
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 06:01:55 -0400
Received: from abu-fatma.softier.local ([212.143.109.38])
	by mxout1.netvision.net.il
	(iPlanet Messaging Server 5.2 HotFix 1.21 (built Sep  8 2003))
	with ESMTP id <0I0W00AK91733D@mxout1.netvision.net.il> for
	qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:01:51 +0300 (IDT)
Date: Thu, 15 Jul 2004 13:01:51 +0300
From: Hetz Ben Hamo <hetz@softier.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] qemu win32 port
In-reply-to: <pan.2004.07.15.08.19.06.114309@reply.to>
Message-id: <200407151301.51493.hetz@softier.com>
MIME-version: 1.0
Content-type: text/plain; charset=windows-1255
Content-transfer-encoding: 7BIT
Content-disposition: inline
References: <pan.2004.07.15.08.19.06.114309@reply.to>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, daimon55@free.fr

On Thursday 15 July 2004 11:19, Ronald wrote:
> Hi,
>
> I have just a small question:
> Is there a reason for the stable and cvs qemu not including
> the patches avaibles for the win32 build?

I'm not sure, but I think my latest snapshot includes the Win32 fixes 
(including slirp support for Windows) that Fabrice commited....

You can use my snapshot or wait for the upcoming 0.6.1 version which includes 
those fixes..

Thanks,
Hetz