From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BrLCb-0002RN-S9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:36:58 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1BrLCZ-0002QJ-Uy
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:36:57 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BrLCZ-0002QG-SX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:36:55 -0400
Received: from [62.241.160.193] (helo=pengo.systems.pipex.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BrL8m-0000Iv-UY
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 14:33:01 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] Arm arch5 support
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 19:32:58 +0100
References: <200408011808.17492.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<20040801174112.GA3224@xi.wantstofly.org>
In-Reply-To: <20040801174112.GA3224@xi.wantstofly.org>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408011932.58538.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: Lennert Buytenhek <buytenh@wantstofly.org>
Cc: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Sunday 01 August 2004 18:41, Lennert Buytenhek wrote:
> Hi Paul,
>
> On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 06:08:17PM +0100, Paul Brook wrote:
> > The attached patch adds qemu target support for the new arm instructions
> > present in the armv5e instruction set.
>
> Have you actually succeeded in getting ARM binaries to run?  I just
> get this all the time (this is with your patch, but I get the same
> effect without it):

I've only run some test assembly code inside an armv4 binary.

> phi% armv5te-redhat-linux-gcc -Wall -o hi hi.c -static
> phi% /tmp/qemu/bin/qemu-arm ./hi
> qemu: uncaught target signal 11 (Segmentation fault) - exiting
> phi%
>
> The binaries generated with this toolchain run fine on a PXA25x, and
> with -mbig-endian they run fine on an Intel IXP2400.

Code for "t" variants (maybe all armv5 targets) probably uses the bx thumb 
interworking instruction, which isn't implemented yet.

Paul