From: "Jim C. Brown" <jbrown106@phreaker.net>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid?
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 18:28:33 -0400 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040801222833.GA12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408011624.27692.menola@sbcglobal.net>
On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joe Menola wrote:
> On Sun August 1 2004 4:15 pm, Ross Kendall Axe wrote:
> > Ronald wrote:
> > | Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:17:22 -0400, Garth Dahlstrom a ?crit :
> > |
> > |
> > | The next limitation could be your file system if you are using fat
> > | with an old windows that is 4G, don't know about ntfs.
> >
> > 2GB actually on FAT32, regardless of Windows version. If the OP is using
> > a 'doze version that's so old as to not support FAT32, he's screwed
> > anyway really. I believe NTFS can do better, at least in recent versions.
> >
> > Ross
>
> 2GB on fat16, not sure about fat32's limit, but it's well above 2gb. NTFS, I
> believe is only limitted to actual disk space.
>
> -jm
>
Not clear on what this thread was about ...
For filesystem size limits:
fat16 is limited to 4GB. fat32's is theoretically 2TB (yes thats terabytes) but
most versions of windows can only read up to 32GB (Windows XP can only make a
new FAT32 partition up to 32GB but I'm not clear on whether or not it can
read a larger pre-exising one). Maximum file size for NTFS is not stated.
File size limits:
fat16 is 2GB, fat32 is only 4GB tho. NTFS is theoretically unlimited.
>
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
>
--
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.
next prev parent reply other threads:[~2004-08-01 22:34 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed top
2004-08-01 16:17 [Qemu-devel] Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid? Garth Dahlstrom
2004-08-01 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ronald
2004-08-01 21:15 ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-08-01 21:24 ` Joe Menola
2004-08-01 22:28 ` Jim C. Brown [this message]
2004-08-02 0:49 ` Jernej Simončič
2004-08-01 21:30 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ronald
2004-08-01 22:42 ` Jim C. Brown
2004-08-02 5:19 ` Ross Kendall Axe
[not found] <-1932696912204019651@unknownmsgid>
2004-08-01 20:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Garth Dahlstrom
[not found] <3328529919214537182@unknownmsgid>
2004-08-02 15:52 ` Garth Dahlstrom
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20040801222833.GA12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org \
--to=jbrown106@phreaker.net \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).