qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jbrown106@phreaker.net>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid?
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 18:28:33 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040801222833.GA12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <200408011624.27692.menola@sbcglobal.net>

On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 04:24:27PM -0500, Joe Menola wrote:
> On Sun August 1 2004 4:15 pm, Ross Kendall Axe wrote:
> > Ronald wrote:
> > | Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:17:22 -0400, Garth Dahlstrom a ?crit :
> > |
> > |
> > | The next limitation could be your file system if you are using fat
> > | with an old windows that is 4G, don't know about ntfs.
> >
> > 2GB actually on FAT32, regardless of Windows version. If the OP is using
> > a 'doze version that's so old as to not support FAT32, he's screwed
> > anyway really. I believe NTFS can do better, at least in recent versions.
> >
> > Ross
> 
> 2GB on fat16, not sure about fat32's limit, but it's well above 2gb. NTFS, I 
> believe is only limitted to actual disk space.
> 
> -jm
> 

Not clear on what this thread was about ...

For filesystem size limits:

fat16 is limited to 4GB. fat32's is theoretically 2TB (yes thats terabytes) but
most versions of windows can only read up to 32GB (Windows XP can only make a
new FAT32 partition up to 32GB but I'm not clear on whether or not it can
read a larger pre-exising one). Maximum file size for NTFS is not stated.

File size limits:

fat16 is 2GB, fat32 is only 4GB tho. NTFS is theoretically unlimited.

> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-01 22:34 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 11+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-01 16:17 [Qemu-devel] Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid? Garth Dahlstrom
2004-08-01 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ronald
2004-08-01 21:15   ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-08-01 21:24     ` Joe Menola
2004-08-01 22:28       ` Jim C. Brown [this message]
2004-08-02  0:49         ` Jernej Simončič
2004-08-01 21:30     ` [Qemu-devel] " Ronald
2004-08-01 22:42       ` Jim C. Brown
2004-08-02  5:19         ` Ross Kendall Axe
     [not found] <-1932696912204019651@unknownmsgid>
2004-08-01 20:20 ` [Qemu-devel] " Garth Dahlstrom
     [not found] <3328529919214537182@unknownmsgid>
2004-08-02 15:52 ` Garth Dahlstrom

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040801222833.GA12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org \
    --to=jbrown106@phreaker.net \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).