qemu-devel.nongnu.org archive mirror
 help / color / mirror / Atom feed
From: "Jim C. Brown" <jbrown106@phreaker.net>
To: daimon55@free.fr, qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: Re: Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid?
Date: Sun, 1 Aug 2004 18:42:19 -0400	[thread overview]
Message-ID: <20040801224219.GB12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> (raw)
In-Reply-To: <pan.2004.08.01.21.30.02.649159@reply.to>

On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:30:11PM +0200, Ronald wrote:
> Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 22:15:57 +0100, Ross Kendall Axe a ?crit?:
> 
> > 
> > Ronald wrote:
> > | Le Sun, 01 Aug 2004 12:17:22 -0400, Garth Dahlstrom a ?crit :
> > |
> > |
> > | The next limitation could be your file system if you are using fat with
> > | an old windows that is 4G, don't know about ntfs.
> > 
> > 2GB actually on FAT32, regardless of Windows version. If the OP is using a
> > 'doze version that's so old as to not support FAT32, he's screwed anyway
> > really. I believe NTFS can do better, at least in recent versions.
> > 
> 
> I think that the 2Gb limitation is true only with linux vfat drivers and
> win can write files =< 4Gb on fat32. 

2GB limit does exist, but its only for fat16.

Last I checked, Linux vfat has a limit of 2GB. But this is because Linux driver
hasn't been updated for new largefile api, and is not a limitation of the
filesystem itself. (Linux/x86 used to have file size limit of 2GB regardless
of filesystem but that has changed with 2.4)

> 
> This is what is said here:
> http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/using/productdoc/en/default.asp?url=/windowsxp/home/using/productdoc/en/choosing_between_NTFS_FAT_and_FAT32.asp

That didn't work for me. This did:

http://www.microsoft.com/windowsxp/home/using/productdoc/en/choosing_between_NTFS_FAT_and_FAT32.asp

(BTW that web page doesn't mention linux at all.)

> 
> 
> 
> _______________________________________________
> Qemu-devel mailing list
> Qemu-devel@nongnu.org
> http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel
> 

-- 
Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty.
Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.

  reply	other threads:[~2004-08-01 22:47 UTC|newest]

Thread overview: 9+ messages / expand[flat|nested]  mbox.gz  Atom feed  top
2004-08-01 16:17 [Qemu-devel] Best way to get 6GB = 3 x 2GB + soft raid? Garth Dahlstrom
2004-08-01 16:43 ` [Qemu-devel] " Ronald
2004-08-01 21:15   ` Ross Kendall Axe
2004-08-01 21:24     ` Joe Menola
2004-08-01 22:28       ` Jim C. Brown
2004-08-02  0:49         ` Jernej Simončič
2004-08-01 21:30     ` [Qemu-devel] " Ronald
2004-08-01 22:42       ` Jim C. Brown [this message]
2004-08-02  5:19         ` Ross Kendall Axe

Reply instructions:

You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:

* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
  and reply-to-all from there: mbox

  Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
  https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style

* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
  switches of git-send-email(1):

  git send-email \
    --in-reply-to=20040801224219.GB12375@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org \
    --to=jbrown106@phreaker.net \
    --cc=daimon55@free.fr \
    --cc=jbrown106@swift-mail.com \
    --cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
    /path/to/YOUR_REPLY

  https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html

* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
  via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).