From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrPPY-0006Z5-U6 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:06:37 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1BrPPW-0006Xy-0i for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:06:35 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1BrPPV-0006XJ-SQ for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:06:33 -0400 Received: from [62.241.160.73] (helo=colossus.systems.pipex.net) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1BrPM8-0006Rm-G7 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 01 Aug 2004 19:03:04 -0400 From: Paul Brook Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] [patch] Arm arch5 support Date: Mon, 2 Aug 2004 00:03:03 +0100 References: <200408011808.17492.paul@codesourcery.com> <20040801213844.GB5265@xi.wantstofly.org> <20040801221610.GA5597@xi.wantstofly.org> In-Reply-To: <20040801221610.GA5597@xi.wantstofly.org> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Disposition: inline Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-1" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Message-Id: <200408020003.03091.paul@codesourcery.com> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Sunday 01 August 2004 23:16, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > On Sun, Aug 01, 2004 at 11:38:44PM +0200, Lennert Buytenhek wrote: > > Your armv4 binaries do work, so do you maybe have any suggestions > > for a target triple I should use? > > I didn't mean to sound as if I don't believe you.. in fact, I > vaguely remember having succeeded in running ARM binaries in > the past, but can't remember how and when. I'm just wondering > what you're doing differently that causes it to work for you, > and not for me and some other people on this list who've tried > in the past. arm-linux, armv4-linux adn armv5te-redhat-linux-gnu toolchains all work. I've run the gcc testsuite on the arm-linux, and am only getting a handful of unexpected failures. The other two I've only verified that "Hello World" works. The toolchains I've built are all configured for static libraries only. I have run dynamically linked programs from a debian-arm chroot. FWIW I'm using CVS HEAD binutils and glibc, and a very slightly modified csl-arm (CodeSourcery) gcc. qemu from cvs head as of yesterday Paul