From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bzk6y-0008WN-S5
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:49:52 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1Bzk6x-0008Vz-5e
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:49:52 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Bzk6x-0008Vw-2O
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:49:51 -0400
Received: from [62.241.160.193] (helo=pengo.systems.pipex.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Bzk2I-0007Ue-6p
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Tue, 24 Aug 2004 18:45:02 -0400
From: Paul Brook <paul@codesourcery.com>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] chroot to ARM Gentoo install.
Date: Tue, 24 Aug 2004 23:44:59 +0100
References: <200408241238.32517.james@alentdesignsolutions.com>
	<200408242106.57803.paul@codesourcery.com>
	<200408241544.59356.james@alentdesignsolutions.com>
In-Reply-To: <200408241544.59356.james@alentdesignsolutions.com>
MIME-Version: 1.0
Content-Disposition: inline
Content-Type: text/plain;
  charset="iso-8859-1"
Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit
Message-Id: <200408242344.59718.paul@codesourcery.com>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org, james@alentdesignsolutions.com

On Tuesday 24 August 2004 23:44, James Pellow wrote:
> Thanks for the quick reply.  I am using an armv4 chip, specifically an
> arm720tdmi.  All code has been built for armv4.
>
> I tried the patch you pointed me to.  Unfortunately I am still seeing the
> same results as previously noted.  Looking at the source for ld.so, I note
> that this is all happening in the elf parsing code.  The actual assert
> looks like:
>
>       assert (info[DT_PLTREL]->d_un.d_val == DT_REL
>               || info[DT_PLTREL]->d_un.d_val == DT_RELA);
>
> (elf/dynamic-link.h:126)
>
> for the case where !ELF_MACHINE_NO_RELA && !ELF_MACHINE_NO_REL are not
> defined...  That didn't make much sense to me yet, as I haven't poked
> around in glibc much.  Its hard for me to imagine that the problem is in
> glibc though since it shouldn't know the difference between running
> natively and running under qemu. (Or is there a subtle difference?)  It
> more obviously seems like elf should parse same either in emulation or not.
>  Since qemu doesn't signal, how should I procede in debugging this?  Any
> further ideas? Thanks for your help.

No idea, sorry.

Paul