From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C2XTT-0005zv-Q9
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:56:39 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C2XTS-0005zA-4R
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:56:38 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2XTS-0005z4-0s
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:56:38 -0400
Received: from [151.189.21.46] (helo=mail-in-01.arcor-online.net)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1C2XOG-0007di-36
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 11:51:16 -0400
Received: from rz.zidlicky.org (dialin-145-254-232-027.arcor-ip.net
	[145.254.232.27])
	by mail-in-01.arcor-online.net (Postfix) with ESMTP id 595D01C5CE
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Wed,  1 Sep 2004 17:51:14 +0200 (CEST)
Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:46:11 +0200
From: Richard Zidlicky <rz@linux-m68k.org>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Re: port to netbsd
Message-ID: <20040901154611.GC13876@linux-m68k.org>
References: <4134FC39.700@ecs.umass.edu> <87hdqjhqp1.fsf@benpfaff.org>
	<41353613.8080304@fastmail.fm> <41351076.4000904@gmx.com>
	<41354363.8060700@fastmail.fm>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=iso-8859-1
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41354363.8060700@fastmail.fm>
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 08:34:59PM -0700, David Howland wrote:
> Bochnig, Martin wrote:
> 
> >I get exactly the same errors when trying to compile for SPARC64 (both 
> >Linux and Solaris10).
> >Giving up.
> 
> Looks like I'm going to aswell.
> 
> >
> >For SPARC32 it helped to use gcc 2.95 or 2.96 instead of gcc3.1/2/3x
> >Curiously enough gcc3.4.1 didn't show this error.
> >Install gcc2.9x into a separate location and try again.
> >While you will get many more warnings and errors, it may help to fix 
> >that damn (hopeless) './dyngen -o op.h op.o' bugs.
> >
> 
> Sounds like a stretch...
> Maybe I should wait until qemu matures a little more before I play the 
> porting game.  Is this dyngen something that can be upgraded/replaced?

no, just make sure you don't compile op.o with fomit-frame-pointer

Richard