From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2cJo-00069R-5h for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:07:00 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2cJk-00067v-CG for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:06:59 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2cJk-00067o-5A for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:06:56 -0400 Received: from [144.254.224.140] (helo=ams-iport-1.cisco.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2cEm-0007JI-GF for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 17:01:48 -0400 Received: from cisco.com (edinburgh.cisco.com [144.254.112.76]) by ams-core-1.cisco.com (8.12.10/8.12.6) with ESMTP id i81KvOTO002802 for ; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 22:57:24 +0200 (MEST) Received: (from dfawcus@localhost) by cisco.com (8.8.8/2.6/Cisco List Logging/8.8.8) id VAA24660 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:57:23 +0100 (BST) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 21:57:23 +0100 From: Derek Fawcus Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Attitute and Predisposition of the List & newbie documets Message-ID: <20040901215723.B23609@edinburgh.cisco.com> References: <1094071089.8840.41.camel@kubu.opensource.se> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii In-Reply-To: <1094071089.8840.41.camel@kubu.opensource.se>; from damm@opensource.se on Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:38:09PM +0200 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 10:38:09PM +0200, Magnus Damm wrote: > > > 2. QEMU-USERS would be great, if it actually worked. > > Is the list broken? Or is no one answering? I suspect it's broke. I believe I subscribed, but I can't recall ever receiving a message from it. DF