From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2hia-0004cZ-9q for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:52:56 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2hiY-0004aK-KA for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:52:55 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2hiY-0004aE-I1 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:52:54 -0400 Received: from [38.113.3.71] (helo=smtp-out.hotpop.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2hdK-0008N0-JI for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 01 Sep 2004 22:47:30 -0400 Received: from phreaker.net (kubrick.hotpop.com [38.113.3.103]) by smtp-out.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id E87E410BCB94 for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 02:47:28 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (pcp02982829pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net [68.85.196.73]) by smtp-1.hotpop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id B6C181A009A for ; Thu, 2 Sep 2004 02:47:26 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 1 Sep 2004 17:58:58 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule? Message-ID: <20040901215857.GA21314@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <000501c48eda$a026ab40$20649c3f@computername> <200408310107.07350.hetz@witch.dyndns.org> <002101c48ee5$46b2e280$20389c3f@computername> <1093908872.26682.76.camel@aragorn> <1C8FBBB0-FB2F-11D8-8B6F-000A95D874F4@mac.com> <1093973009.29476.16.camel@sherbert> <4134DF1A.4010407@bellard.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <4134DF1A.4010407@bellard.org> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Tue, Aug 31, 2004 at 10:27:06PM +0200, Fabrice Bellard wrote: > My current priorities for QEMU are speed and emulation correctness for > both x86 and PowerPC host and guests. About the GUI, as I said earlier, > I would be delighted if someone submitted a GTK and/or a win32 GUI > directly integrated in QEMU - I tend to dislike the 'frontend' approach. > I won't work on the GUI in the forseeable future. > I am curious, what is wrong with using Xlib directly? Would you accept an Xlib patch if it was simple enough to understand? > > Fabrice. > > > -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.