From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2m4h-0000uJ-BR for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:32:03 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1C2m4f-0000u1-Rf for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:32:03 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C2m4f-0000tx-No for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:32:01 -0400 Received: from [62.4.22.179] (helo=mail.bbrox.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C2lzb-00066i-Cs for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 03:26:47 -0400 Date: Thu, 2 Sep 2004 09:26:45 +0200 From: Lionel Ulmer Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule? Message-ID: <20040902092645.A15294@bbland> References: <000501c48eda$a026ab40$20649c3f@computername> <200408310107.07350.hetz@witch.dyndns.org> <002101c48ee5$46b2e280$20389c3f@computername> <1093908872.26682.76.camel@aragorn> <1C8FBBB0-FB2F-11D8-8B6F-000A95D874F4@mac.com> <1093973009.29476.16.camel@sherbert> <4134DF1A.4010407@bellard.org> <20040901215857.GA21314@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20040901215857.GA21314@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>; from jbrown106@phreaker.net on Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:58:58PM -0400 Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 01, 2004 at 05:58:58PM -0400, Jim C. Brown wrote: > I am curious, what is wrong with using Xlib directly? Would you accept an > Xlib patch if it was simple enough to understand? Well, the problem with using Xlib directly instead of via SDL is that you loose easy portability to the Win32 platform (except if you ask people to install an X server in Windows :-) ). Lionel -- Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/