From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C3161-0008Go-KB
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 19:34:25 -0400
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1C315z-0008GS-Ha
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 19:34:25 -0400
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1C315z-0008GG-CQ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 19:34:23 -0400
Received: from [62.4.22.179] (helo=mail.bbrox.com)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1C310T-00009F-Az
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Sep 2004 19:28:41 -0400
Date: Fri, 3 Sep 2004 01:28:35 +0200
From: Lionel Ulmer <lionel.ulmer@free.fr>
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Qemu development schedule?
Message-ID: <20040903012835.A21319@bbland>
References: <000501c48eda$a026ab40$20649c3f@computername>
	<200408310107.07350.hetz@witch.dyndns.org>
	<002101c48ee5$46b2e280$20389c3f@computername>
	<1093908872.26682.76.camel@aragorn>
	<1C8FBBB0-FB2F-11D8-8B6F-000A95D874F4@mac.com>
	<1093973009.29476.16.camel@sherbert> <4134DF1A.4010407@bellard.org>
	<20040901215857.GA21314@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
	<20040902092645.A15294@bbland>
	<20040902205633.GB21292@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20040902205633.GB21292@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>;
	from jbrown106@phreaker.net on Thu, Sep 02, 2004 at 04:56:33PM
	-0400
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> So? Fabrice has said that he'll add support got the Win32 GUI directly if some
> one sends a patch for it ... surely this makes it hard to port to the Linux
> platform???

My only problem with that is that I do not wish to see the QEMU code go down
the #ifdef / #endif hell (with #ifdef X11 / COCOA / WIN32 / .... sprinkled
anywhere over the code).

So such patches are great .... if they are based on a framework that make
adding new display / input / sound drivers painless (i.e. without touching a
single line of code in QEMU's main code).

             Lionel

-- 
		 Lionel Ulmer - http://www.bbrox.org/