From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CAEKV-0006dN-VL for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:07:12 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CAEKS-0006Zp-8k for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:07:10 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CAEKS-0006ZH-3l for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:07:08 -0400 Received: from [38.113.3.71] (helo=smtp-out.hotpop.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CAEEI-0002kj-IS for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:00:47 -0400 Received: from phreaker.net (kubrick.hotpop.com [38.113.3.103]) by smtp-out.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 3482410E737A for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:00:29 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (pcp03144805pcs.midval01.tn.comcast.net [68.59.228.236]) by smtp-3.hotpop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id 391A710E737A for ; Wed, 22 Sep 2004 21:00:25 +0000 (UTC) Date: Wed, 22 Sep 2004 17:00:30 -0400 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] w2000 host networking question Message-ID: <20040922210030.GA18599@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <4152D15D.1040602@bigpond.net.au> <1095853793.19743.18.camel@rapid> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <1095853793.19743.18.camel@rapid> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Wed, Sep 22, 2004 at 01:49:53PM +0200, J. Mayer wrote: > Could you please fix your computer system date ? > > Thanks. This has what to do with the original question??? Wrong computer times (or, I suspect in this case, wrong timezone setting) are annoying but not worth spamming the mailing list. It's better to reply to this in private. (BTW The person you replied to wrote on Thu, 23 Sep 2004 09:36:29 GMT - 0400, and seems to be in australia. You replied on Wed, 22 Sep 2004 13:49:53 GMT + 0200 and seem to be in france.) > > -- > J. Mayer > Never organized > Anyways, On Thu, 23 Sep 2004 at 09:36:29 -0400, Kim Adil wrote: > I have searched the docs and do not believe the answer is available, > forgive me if it is there somewhere. I am using the windows port of qemu > on a w2k host (using "-user-net"). I have installed knoppix as a guest > and it works well. I am able to ping the host and use "smbclient -L > -W -U " and it reports the available shares > on the host, but smbmount will not connect. I have not applied any > patches, but the network appears to be working. I cannot ping any other > hosts on the switch though. Can someone explain if it is possilbe to > have the guest pc virtually on the lan with the windows host yet. Also > is there any binaries available with patches applied? > > Thanks, > Kim Bochs can do this. It uses winpcap, which in turn edits raw packets in the ethernet driver. Someone (I don't remember who) said this was possible for qemu to do, but I have never seen any code for qemu to do this. So my conclusion is still no. (I would love to be proved wrong.) BTW this question was answered before on this list and you can find it if you search the mailing list archive. If you mean to have -user-net put the guest pc on the host lan, that is not possible, since user-net works via translating ethernet packets on the guest to socket calls on the host. -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.