From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CENRo-0008IV-9W for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:39:52 -0400 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1CENRl-0008Gg-LD for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:39:49 -0400 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CENRl-0008GX-GT for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:39:49 -0400 Received: from [212.227.126.184] (helo=moutng.kundenserver.de) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CENL3-0008Og-Tx for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 03:32:54 -0400 Received: from [212.227.126.155] (helo=mrelayng.kundenserver.de) by moutng.kundenserver.de with esmtp (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CENL3-0004pJ-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 09:32:53 +0200 Received: from [83.169.139.51] (helo=zimmer.altersheim.de) by mrelayng.kundenserver.de with asmtp (TLSv1:RC4-MD5:128) (Exim 3.35 #1) id 1CENL3-0000aK-00 for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Mon, 04 Oct 2004 09:32:53 +0200 From: Alexander Opitz Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] crash (SIGSEGV) Date: Mon, 4 Oct 2004 09:43:08 +0200 References: <200410040150.49551.opi@le-bit.de> <4160A400.1040003@dad-answers.com> In-Reply-To: <4160A400.1040003@dad-answers.com> MIME-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset="iso-8859-15" Content-Transfer-Encoding: 7bit Content-Disposition: inline Message-Id: <200410040943.08907.opi@le-bit.de> Reply-To: opi@le-bit.de, qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org Am Montag, 4. Oktober 2004 03:14 schrieben Sie: > Which version of QEMU do you use? I suggest pulling from CVS or grabbing > my nightly snapshot for testing.. Ups, I forgett to tell ... I'm using latest from cvs :) > Is there any reason you're looking to use it? I just looked at their > "bios" directory in their CVS and there's no really major change > compared to the QEMU BIOS.. Unless I missed something? I don't know what is more actuall, the bios.diff is against rombios.c,v 1.110 and latest one from bochs is rombios.c,v 1.119 and that's why I ask. (Also the debian project seems to have only one bios package and try to use it for bochs and qemu). Greetings Alex//