From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CPHh5-0004Ig-DG
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 04:44:43 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CPHh4-0004IH-Gu
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 04:44:42 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CPHh4-0004IB-8g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 04:44:42 -0500
Received: from [130.136.1.101] (helo=lea.cs.unibo.it)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CPHYc-0005FJ-4h
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Wed, 03 Nov 2004 04:35:58 -0500
Date: Wed, 3 Nov 2004 10:35:53 +0100
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] problems with dual ethernet networking
Message-ID: <20041103093553.GA23923@cs.unibo.it>
References: <20041102184443.GB18735@circolab.net>
	<20041103024531.GA19904@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <20041103024531.GA19904@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org>
From: renzo@cs.unibo.it (Renzo Davoli)
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

> > vdeq qemu -sock /tmp/vde1.ctl,/tmp/vde2.ctl -nics 2 -hda vivian.img
> No it is not implemented. vdeq is meant for only one sock at a time.

Actually, it was implemented in qemu and vdeq used the multiple  
-tun-fd  option provided bu qemu.

Now I'll try to see what has happened inside the qemu code.

Stay tuned.
		renzo