From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CZz1p-0002c4-Ky
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:02:21 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CZz1o-0002bl-Vj
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:02:21 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CZz1o-0002bb-TF
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 17:02:20 -0500
Received: from [80.71.3.114] (helo=kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (TLSv1:DES-CBC3-SHA:168)
	(Exim 4.34) id 1CZysA-0001Pu-Sp
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Thu, 02 Dec 2004 16:52:23 -0500
Received: from localhost (localhost [127.0.0.1])
	by kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk (Postfix) with ESMTP id 1EEB37A0AE
	for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>; Thu,  2 Dec 2004 21:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Received: from kerouac.projectcolo.org.uk ([127.0.0.1])
	by localhost (kerouac [127.0.0.1]) (amavisd-new, port 10024)
	with ESMTP id 30662-02 for <qemu-devel@nongnu.org>;
	Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:52:22 +0000 (GMT)
Date: Thu, 2 Dec 2004 21:52:24 +0000
Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] Running Plan9
Message-ID: <20041202215224.GA6239@z273.org.uk>
References: <20041201223253.GA5491@z273.org.uk> <41AF7893.8020800@bellard.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
In-Reply-To: <41AF7893.8020800@bellard.org>
From: bacam@z273.org.uk (Brian Campbell)
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

On Thu, Dec 02, 2004 at 09:18:27PM +0100, Fabrice Bellard wrote:
> It should work now!

Works fine.  Thanks.