From: Tim <tim-qemu@sentinelchicken.org>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
Subject: [Qemu-devel] vl.h: DisplayState's void functions
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:43:58 -0500 [thread overview]
Message-ID: <20041204054358.GD1964@sentinelchicken.org> (raw)
Hello,
Maybe this is a stupid question, but is there a reason why it would be
bad to change this struct's function pointers to accept functions which
return a value? It might be good to allow the return of error
codes from these functions, or at least a boolean, and currently there
isn't a convenient way to do so. Could they be changed to return an int
instead?
I can submit a patch for this, if y'all think it is a good idea.
thanks,
tim
reply other threads:[~2004-12-04 5:54 UTC|newest]
Thread overview: [no followups] expand[flat|nested] mbox.gz Atom feed
Reply instructions:
You may reply publicly to this message via plain-text email
using any one of the following methods:
* Save the following mbox file, import it into your mail client,
and reply-to-all from there: mbox
Avoid top-posting and favor interleaved quoting:
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Posting_style#Interleaved_style
* Reply using the --to, --cc, and --in-reply-to
switches of git-send-email(1):
git send-email \
--in-reply-to=20041204054358.GD1964@sentinelchicken.org \
--to=tim-qemu@sentinelchicken.org \
--cc=qemu-devel@nongnu.org \
/path/to/YOUR_REPLY
https://kernel.org/pub/software/scm/git/docs/git-send-email.html
* If your mail client supports setting the In-Reply-To header
via mailto: links, try the mailto: link
Be sure your reply has a Subject: header at the top and a blank line
before the message body.
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).