From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CaSs8-0006Jn-W0
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:54:21 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CaSs8-0006Jb-JJ
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:54:20 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CaSs8-0006JY-FC
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:54:20 -0500
Received: from [64.105.49.83] (helo=claudius.sentinelchicken.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1CaSi8-0004tp-Ca
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 04 Dec 2004 00:44:00 -0500
Date: Sat, 4 Dec 2004 00:43:58 -0500
From: Tim <tim-qemu@sentinelchicken.org>
Message-ID: <20041204054358.GD1964@sentinelchicken.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Qemu-devel] vl.h: DisplayState's void functions
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hello,

Maybe this is a stupid question, but is there a reason why it would be
bad to change this struct's function pointers to accept functions which
return a value?  It might be good to allow the return of error
codes from these functions, or at least a boolean, and currently there
isn't a convenient way to do so.  Could they be changed to return an int
instead?

I can submit a patch for this, if y'all think it is a good idea.

thanks,
tim