* [Qemu-devel] vl.h: DisplayState's void functions
@ 2004-12-04 5:43 Tim
0 siblings, 0 replies; only message in thread
From: Tim @ 2004-12-04 5:43 UTC (permalink / raw)
To: qemu-devel
Hello,
Maybe this is a stupid question, but is there a reason why it would be
bad to change this struct's function pointers to accept functions which
return a value? It might be good to allow the return of error
codes from these functions, or at least a boolean, and currently there
isn't a convenient way to do so. Could they be changed to return an int
instead?
I can submit a patch for this, if y'all think it is a good idea.
thanks,
tim
^ permalink raw reply [flat|nested] only message in thread
only message in thread, other threads:[~2004-12-04 5:54 UTC | newest]
Thread overview: (only message) (download: mbox.gz follow: Atom feed
-- links below jump to the message on this page --
2004-12-04 5:43 [Qemu-devel] vl.h: DisplayState's void functions Tim
This is a public inbox, see mirroring instructions
for how to clone and mirror all data and code used for this inbox;
as well as URLs for NNTP newsgroup(s).