From mboxrd@z Thu Jan 1 00:00:00 1970 Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cdh00-0004Co-Au for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:35:48 -0500 Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33) id 1Cdgzz-0004CO-Nv for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:35:47 -0500 Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org) by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1Cdgzz-0004CF-Kr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:35:47 -0500 Received: from [38.113.3.71] (helo=smtp-out.hotpop.com) by monty-python.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cdgjm-0004Ic-Cr for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sun, 12 Dec 2004 22:19:02 -0500 Received: from phreaker.net (kubrick.hotpop.com [38.113.3.103]) by smtp-out.hotpop.com (Postfix) with SMTP id 0D66C127D564 for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 02:24:25 +0000 (UTC) Received: from jbrown.mylinuxbox.org (unknown [68.59.228.236]) by smtp-1.hotpop.com (Postfix) with ESMTP id A38881A015F for ; Mon, 13 Dec 2004 00:08:05 +0000 (UTC) Date: Sun, 12 Dec 2004 19:06:29 -0500 From: "Jim C. Brown" Subject: Re: [Qemu-devel] FreeBSD 5.3 guest fdc and ed0 problems Message-ID: <20041213000628.GA16760@jbrown.mylinuxbox.org> References: <20041213001546.A16553@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Mime-Version: 1.0 Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii Content-Disposition: inline In-Reply-To: <20041213001546.A16553@saturn.kn-bremen.de> Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org List-Unsubscribe: , List-Archive: List-Post: List-Help: List-Subscribe: , To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org On Mon, Dec 13, 2004 at 12:15:46AM +0100, Juergen Lock wrote: > (his kernel probed ed0 on irq 11, is that the reason? i always > get it on irq 9) Possibly, as ne2k is always on irq 9. -- Infinite complexity begets infinite beauty. Infinite precision begets infinite perfection.