From mboxrd@z Thu Jan  1 00:00:00 1970
Received: from mailman by lists.gnu.org with tmda-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CfiHv-0004ce-JX
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:22:39 -0500
Received: from exim by lists.gnu.org with spam-scanned (Exim 4.33)
	id 1CfiHu-0004cA-NU
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:22:39 -0500
Received: from [199.232.76.173] (helo=monty-python.gnu.org)
	by lists.gnu.org with esmtp (Exim 4.33) id 1CfiHu-0004c5-F8
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:22:38 -0500
Received: from [64.105.49.83] (helo=claudius.sentinelchicken.org)
	by monty-python.gnu.org with smtp (Exim 4.34) id 1Cfi3n-00006X-6g
	for qemu-devel@nongnu.org; Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:08:03 -0500
Date: Sat, 18 Dec 2004 12:08:02 -0500
From: Tim <tim-qemu@sentinelchicken.org>
Message-ID: <20041218170802.GC2546@sentinelchicken.org>
Mime-Version: 1.0
Content-Type: text/plain; charset=us-ascii
Content-Disposition: inline
Subject: [Qemu-devel] Test Scaffolding
Reply-To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org
List-Id: qemu-devel.nongnu.org
List-Unsubscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=unsubscribe>
List-Archive: <http://lists.gnu.org/pipermail/qemu-devel>
List-Post: <mailto:qemu-devel@nongnu.org>
List-Help: <mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=help>
List-Subscribe: <http://lists.nongnu.org/mailman/listinfo/qemu-devel>,
	<mailto:qemu-devel-request@nongnu.org?subject=subscribe>
To: qemu-devel@nongnu.org

Hello,

I have a bit of free time over the next few weeks, and thought it might
be interesting and useful to implement some type of randomized tests for
Qemu's system emmulation.  One thought I had was to generate a large
number of small disk images with (partially or fully) randomized boot
sectors and then try booting off of those.  Basically it would be a raw
stability test to see if Qemu falls over under weird circumstances. Some
questions I had: 

  - Would this approach be a useful test of the system stability?

  - Would this kind of test pose any significant risk to my underlying
    host system?

  - Can you think of a better randomized test scenario?


The inspriation for this comes from a little program called crashme
(http://people.delphiforums.com/gjc/crashme.html), which is designed to
test an OSes ability to handle random binaries.  Obviously, this could
be run under Linux in a VM, but Linux would likely contain much of the
weird cases and Qemu wouldn't be exposed to the dangerous cases.

Thanks,
tim